Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Dorothea Bell v. Kelly Bell
SC Pennsylvania · May 11, 2026
PA / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfamilytrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Dorothea Bell v. Kelly Bell, the SC Pennsylvania addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that the court's research and Maternal Grandmother's brief indicate the cited case is unlocatable/nonexistent. The source record does not state a separate procedural consequence. The entry is dated 2026-05-11. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
- Why the court cared
- The linked source identifies the filing problem as: The court's research and Maternal Grandmother's brief indicate the cited case is unlocatable/nonexistent..
- Why it matters now
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Why this matter is tracked
In Dorothea Bell v. Kelly Bell, the SC Pennsylvania addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that the court's research and Maternal Grandmother's brief indicate the cited case is unlocatable/nonexistent. The source record does not state a separate procedural consequence. The entry is dated 2026-05-11. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
Operational lesson
The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Record details
PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC Pennsylvania
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit3rd Circuit
DateMay 11, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The court's research and Maternal Grandmother's brief indicate the cited case is unlocatable/nonexistent.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Dorothea Bell v. Kelly Bell?
- In Dorothea Bell v. Kelly Bell, the SC Pennsylvania addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that the court's research and Maternal Grandmother's brief indicate the cited case is unlocatable/nonexistent. The source record does not state a separate procedural consequence. The entry is dated 2026-05-11. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
- Why does Dorothea Bell v. Kelly Bell matter for legal AI risk?
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
- What does the public record establish about Dorothea Bell v. Kelly Bell?
- Limited to the linked source and the documented citation or quotation issue and stated disposition; no unrecorded tool, motive, or broader litigation facts are inferred.
- Which source supports this Dorothea Bell v. Kelly Bell summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.