HomeCasesBurnside v. Verdick, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Burnside v. Verdick, et al.

S.D. Iowa · Apr 30, 2026

IA / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationscivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Jones v. County of Los Angeles, 802 Fed. App’x 282 (9th Cir. 2020)'; court found no such case and Westlaw returned In re Wing Cheung Wong, 802 F. App'x 280, 282 (9th Cir. 2020). Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to Show Cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in S.D. Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in S.D. Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IowaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Iowa

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit8th Circuit

DateApr 30, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Jones v. County of Los Angeles, 802 Fed. App’x 282 (9th Cir. 2020)'; court found no such case and Westlaw returned In re Wing Cheung Wong, 802 F. App'x 280, 282 (9th Cir. 2020).
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Thompson v. Hong, 2020 IL App (2d) 190551'; court found the citation corresponds to Fay v. Fifty K Corporation, No. 2-19-0551, 2020 WL 2095845 (Ill. App. Ct. Apr. 29, 2020) (alt. 2020 IL App (2d) 190551-U).
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Wallace v. County of Los Angeles, 479 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (C.D. Cal. 2020)'; court located Curtis v. Oliver, 479 F. Supp. 3d 1039, 1088 (D.N.M. 2020) instead, indicating mismatch/nonexistent title.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Estate of Smith v. Shulz, 2018 WL 2192187 (N.D. Iowa)'; court found the citation number corresponds to Cabrera v. N.Y. Fresh Meat Inc., 2018 WL 2192187 (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2018), not a N.D. Iowa decision.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Yates v. Mansfield, 2014 WL 11535036 (S.D. Iowa)'; court search returned a U.S. FDA safety report (Feb. 19, 2014) rather than any S.D. Iowa case, indicating a non-existent case citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Doe v. United States, 463 F. Supp. 2d 934 (N.D. Iowa 2006)'; court found Lampe v. Genuine Parts Co., 463 F. Supp. 2d 928, 934 (E.D. Wis. 2006) instead, indicating the cited caption/court was incorrect or fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Burnside v. Verdick, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Jones v. County of Los Angeles, 802 Fed. App’x 282 (9th Cir. 2020)'; court found no such case and Westlaw returned In re Wing Cheung Wong, 802 F. App'x 280, 282 (9th Cir. 2020). Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why does Burnside v. Verdick, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in S.D. Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Burnside v. Verdick, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Burnside v. Verdick, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

April Ann Nelson v. Navient Solutions, LLC, et al.S.D. Iowa · Sep 4, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Julia Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc., et al.M.D. Florida · Jul 12, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Holmes v. Cape Meadows Apartments HRMSE.D. Missouri · Jul 10, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Jordan Slach v. City of Battle GroundW.D. Washington · Jul 2, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Yuri Petrini v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi, et al.S.D. Mississippi · Jun 30, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

IowaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Iowa

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit8th Circuit

DateApr 30, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Thompson v. Hong, 2020 IL App (2d) 190551'; court found the citation corresponds to Fay v. Fifty K Corporation, No. 2-19-0551, 2020 WL 2095845 (Ill. App. Ct. Apr. 29, 2020) (alt. 2020 IL App (2d) 190551-U).

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Wallace v. County of Los Angeles, 479 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (C.D. Cal. 2020)'; court located Curtis v. Oliver, 479 F. Supp. 3d 1039, 1088 (D.N.M. 2020) instead, indicating mismatch/nonexistent title.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Estate of Smith v. Shulz, 2018 WL 2192187 (N.D. Iowa)'; court found the citation number corresponds to Cabrera v. N.Y. Fresh Meat Inc., 2018 WL 2192187 (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2018), not a N.D. Iowa decision.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Yates v. Mansfield, 2014 WL 11535036 (S.D. Iowa)'; court search returned a U.S. FDA safety report (Feb. 19, 2014) rather than any S.D. Iowa case, indicating a non-existent case citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Doe v. United States, 463 F. Supp. 2d 934 (N.D. Iowa 2006)'; court found Lampe v. Genuine Parts Co., 463 F. Supp. 2d 928, 934 (E.D. Wis. 2006) instead, indicating the cited caption/court was incorrect or fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Burnside v. Verdick, et al.?

Why does Burnside v. Verdick, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Burnside v. Verdick, et al.?

Which source supports this Burnside v. Verdick, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.