Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 12, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 10, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/recorded consequences/Ordered To Show Cause
Source-linked corpus view

Ordered To Show Cause

Ordered To Show Cause appears in 97 of 2,039 public corpus records (4.8%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records97
Corpus denominator2,039
Source linked100%
Latest trackedSep 10, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What issues appear in matters recording Ordered To Show Cause?

Taxonomy definition: A court or authority ordered a participant to show cause why sanctions or another response should not issue.

AI Vortex currently links 97 source-linked public matters that record Ordered To Show Cause. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (85), Misrepresented authority (53) and Fabricated or altered quotations (43). Recorded responses and outcomes include Order to show cause (97), Bar or professional referral (2) and Filing or pleading struck (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the consequence.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities85 records
Leading recorded responseOrder to show cause97 records
Known numeric amounts$7,0001 known · 0 unquantified
Recorded date rangeApr 26, 2024through Sep 10, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 97 matching records.

Ulysse v. Vineland Investment Partners Phase II, LLCCA Florida (6d) · FL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 10, 2026
Wurm v. Anchor Bay Packaging CorporationE.D. Michigan · MI · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 4, 2026
Falkenstein v. NilesC.D. California · CA · Unidentified
Sep 3, 2026
AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLCW.D. Missouri · MS · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 25, 2026
Michael Dotson v. Bob Evans Farms, LLCC.D. California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 20, 2026
Snisko v. Cascade Funding Mortgage Trust HB4N.D. Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 19, 2026
Davis v. Gopal, Didyuk, and Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsShelby County Circuit Court, Tenn. · US · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 14, 2026
United States of America v. SmithN.D. Illinois · IL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 7, 2026
Jennifer Lynn Cain v. Hyatt CorporationW.D. Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 5, 2026
Ali Jabbari v. Parviz Omidvar, et al.C.D. California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 3, 2026
Danielle Maloit v. Frank Daniel MaloitD. Colorado · CO · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 29, 2026
Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (1)D. Arizona · AZ · Claude AI
Jul 28, 2026
Gideon J. Sipin v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., et al.N.D. Alabama · AL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 22, 2026
Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.CA Florida (4d) · FL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 22, 2026
Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.C.D. California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 2, 2026
Kevin Leiske et al. v. Robert Gregory Kidd et al.Delaware Ch. · DE · Perplexity
Jul 1, 2026
Jaime Alexander Davidson v. Nayeli Nadir Chang-WarnerCA Florida (6d) · FL · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 26, 2026
Xinyue Hippe v. Retention Brands, LLCE.D. Wisconsin · WI · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 23, 2026
Euphoric, LLC et al. v. Westport Community Improvement District, et al. (2)W.D. Missouri · MS · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 22, 2026
Habib & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal · GB · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 12, 2026
In re Garcia-MartzN.D. Indiana (Bankruptcy) · IN · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 10, 2026
Tlingit Haida Tribal Business Corporation v. OnePromomD. Colorado · CO · Eve Legal
Jun 9, 2026
Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.W.D. North Carolina · NC · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 3, 2026
Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et alD. Colorado · CO · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 29, 2026
Open the full analytics view

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.