HomeCasesCarlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

D. New Mexico · Nov 25, 2025

NM / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsemploymenttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Keller v. Bd. of Educ., 182 F.R.D. 871 (D.N.M. 1998)' in multiple filings; the court found that citation does not exist (a similarly named, different-year decision exists). Outcome: Adverse Costs Order. Sanction confirmed later (here) with costs decided in March 2026.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Keller v. Bd. of Educ., 182 F.R.D. 871 (D.N.M. 1998)' in multiple filings; the court found that citation does not exist (a similarly named, different-year decision exists). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Ford v. BNSF Ry. Co., 709 F.3d 715 (10th Cir. 2013)' in multiple filings; the court found this reported Tenth Circuit citation does not exist (similar-named but different case exists in another court). || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Rogers v. NYU Langone Hospitals, 2023 WL 2705769' in his first motion for sanctions; the court found this case does not exist and Defendant had pointed this out.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Mexico, with the listed outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Mexico, with the listed outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Record details

New MexicoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. New Mexico

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateNov 25, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAdverse Costs Order

Known amount$8,640

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Adverse Costs Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Keller v. Bd. of Educ., 182 F.R.D. 871 (D.N.M. 1998)' in multiple filings; the court found that citation does not exist (a similarly named, different-year decision exists).
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Ford v. BNSF Ry. Co., 709 F.3d 715 (10th Cir. 2013)' in multiple filings; the court found this reported Tenth Circuit citation does not exist (similar-named but different case exists in another court).
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Rogers v. NYU Langone Hospitals, 2023 WL 2705769' in his first motion for sanctions; the court found this case does not exist and Defendant had pointed this out.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Keller v. Bd. of Educ., 182 F.R.D. 871 (D.N.M. 1998)' in multiple filings; the court found that citation does not exist (a similarly named, different-year decision exists). Outcome: Adverse Costs Order. Sanction confirmed later (here) with costs decided in March 2026.
Why does Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Mexico, with the listed outcome: Adverse Costs Order.
What does the public record establish about Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sample et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, IncD. New Mexico · May 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (2)D. New Mexico · May 21, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (1)D. New Mexico · Nov 5, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Clifford Robert Cummings v. The Estate of Forrest FennD. New Mexico · Oct 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Tomlin v. State of New MexicoD. New Mexico · Feb 1, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public SchoolsD. New Mexico · May 7, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Mexico, with the listed outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Record details

New MexicoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. New Mexico

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateNov 25, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAdverse Costs Order

Known amount$8,640

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Ford v. BNSF Ry. Co., 709 F.3d 715 (10th Cir. 2013)' in multiple filings; the court found this reported Tenth Circuit citation does not exist (similar-named but different case exists in another court).

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Rogers v. NYU Langone Hospitals, 2023 WL 2705769' in his first motion for sanctions; the court found this case does not exist and Defendant had pointed this out.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.?

Why does Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Mexico, with the listed outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

What does the public record establish about Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.?

Which source supports this Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.