HomeCasesCarrington v TAFE Queensland

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Carrington v TAFE Queensland

Queensland IRC · Dec 5, 2025

AustraliaEditorial impact: lowfake citationsemploymenttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Coleman v State of Queensland [2021] QIRC 243'; the court found that [2021] QIRC 243 corresponds to Chan & Ors v State of Queensland and could not locate the asserted authority as cited.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Coleman v State of Queensland [2021] QIRC 243'; the court found that [2021] QIRC 243 corresponds to Chan & Ors v State of Queensland and could not locate the asserted authority as cited. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'McLennan v State of Queensland [2022] QIRC 123'; the court could not locate a decision with McLennan as a party and noted [2022] QIRC 123 is Da Silva Rocha v State of Queensland (No 2).
Why it matters now: Neutral-citation numbers that point to different cases are a tell — cross-check every QIRC/neutral citation against the actual decision.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Neutral-citation numbers that point to different cases are a tell — cross-check every QIRC/neutral citation against the actual decision.

Record details

CourtQueensland IRC

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateDec 5, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Coleman v State of Queensland [2021] QIRC 243'; the court found that [2021] QIRC 243 corresponds to Chan & Ors v State of Queensland and could not locate the asserted authority as cited.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'McLennan v State of Queensland [2022] QIRC 123'; the court could not locate a decision with McLennan as a party and noted [2022] QIRC 123 is Da Silva Rocha v State of Queensland (No 2).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Carrington v TAFE Queensland?: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Coleman v State of Queensland [2021] QIRC 243'; the court found that [2021] QIRC 243 corresponds to Chan & Ors v State of Queensland and could not locate the asserted authority as cited.
Why does Carrington v TAFE Queensland matter for legal AI risk?: Neutral-citation numbers that point to different cases are a tell — cross-check every QIRC/neutral citation against the actual decision.
What does the public record establish about Carrington v TAFE Queensland?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Carrington v TAFE Queensland summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Clarke v State of Queensland (Department of Education)Queensland IRC · Nov 5, 2025same court · fake citations + employment Goodchild v State of QueenslandQueensland IRC · Feb 13, 2025same court · fake citations + employment Ellul v State of QueenslandQueensland IRC · Apr 29, 2026same court · employment + trial Pakuza v Workers' Compensation RegulatorQueensland IRC · Dec 16, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Ivins v KMA Consulting Engineers & OrsQueensland IRC · Jun 2, 2025same court · fake citations + trial M J Molawa and Others v Matjhabeng Local MunicipalityLabour Court (Durban) · Jul 13, 2026fake citations + employment · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Neutral-citation numbers that point to different cases are a tell — cross-check every QIRC/neutral citation against the actual decision.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'McLennan v State of Queensland [2022] QIRC 123'; the court could not locate a decision with McLennan as a party and noted [2022] QIRC 123 is Da Silva Rocha v State of Queensland (No 2).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Carrington v TAFE Queensland?

Why does Carrington v TAFE Queensland matter for legal AI risk?

Neutral-citation numbers that point to different cases are a tell — cross-check every QIRC/neutral citation against the actual decision.

What does the public record establish about Carrington v TAFE Queensland?

Which source supports this Carrington v TAFE Queensland summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.