Cindy Vanessa Venegas Martínez v. Flerida Paola Morales Picado
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Edward Cortes García; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
TA San José · Jul 28, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The filing invoked article 154 of the Código Procesal Civil for the duty to motivate and substantiate judicial decisions. The court stated that article 154 concerns patrimonial effects of attachments and that the relevant provision was article 28.1.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The filing invoked article 154 of the Código Procesal Civil for the duty to motivate and substantiate judicial decisions. The court stated that article 154 concerns patrimonial effects of attachments and that the relevant provision was article 28.1.
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The filing invoked article 154 of the Código Procesal Civil for the duty to motivate and substantiate judicial decisions. The court stated that article 154 concerns patrimonial effects of attachments and that the relevant provision was article 28.1.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The filing referred to supposed national jurisprudence without providing vote or decision numbers, preventing verification of the authorities relied upon.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Cindy Vanessa Venegas Martínez v. Flerida Paola Morales Picado?
- Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The filing invoked article 154 of the Código Procesal Civil for the duty to motivate and substantiate judicial decisions. The court stated that article 154 concerns patrimonial effects of attachments and that the relevant provision was article 28.1.
- Why does Cindy Vanessa Venegas Martínez v. Flerida Paola Morales Picado matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Cindy Vanessa Venegas Martínez v. Flerida Paola Morales Picado?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Cindy Vanessa Venegas Martínez v. Flerida Paola Morales Picado summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.