Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Danuta Dec v. Homeland Security
7th Cir. CA · Mar 30, 2026
/ federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesimmigrationappellate
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Opening brief included a false quotation (an imaginary quote) attributed in support of the standard of review; court found the quotation was inaccurate and likely AI-generated. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Counsel who 'cannot explain' a fabricated cite when questioned escalate admonishment into discipline risk.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Opening brief included a false quotation (an imaginary quote) attributed in support of the standard of review; court found the quotation was inaccurate and likely AI-generated. Outcome: Admonishment.
Operational lesson
Counsel who 'cannot explain' a fabricated cite when questioned escalate admonishment into discipline risk.
Record details
Court7th Cir. CA
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit7th Circuit
DateMar 30, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Admonishment
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Opening brief included a false quotation (an imaginary quote) attributed in support of the standard of review; court found the quotation was inaccurate and likely AI-generated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief cited a non-existent case (first instance); court identified it as a fabricated citation likely from AI and counsel could not explain its source.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief cited a second non-existent case; court treated this as another fabricated citation and noted counsel's inability to account for it.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Danuta Dec v. Homeland Security?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Opening brief included a false quotation (an imaginary quote) attributed in support of the standard of review; court found the quotation was inaccurate and likely AI-generated. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why does Danuta Dec v. Homeland Security matter for legal AI risk?
- Counsel who 'cannot explain' a fabricated cite when questioned escalate admonishment into discipline risk.
- What does the public record establish about Danuta Dec v. Homeland Security?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Danuta Dec v. Homeland Security summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.