Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Desmond Cunningham v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al.
N.D. Mississippi · Jan 7, 2026
MS / federalEditorial impact: career endingpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Cunningham cited a purported D. Conn. opinion with a Westlaw citation and date that did not correspond to any docket entry for that case; the court concluded the representation of the Housatonic citation was fabricated. Outcome: All claims dismissed with prejudice; warning.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cunningham cited a purported D. Conn. opinion with a Westlaw citation and date that did not correspond to any docket entry for that case; the court concluded the representation of the Housatonic citation was fabricated. || False Quotes: Case Law | Cunningham attributed a specific quotation to International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's, Inc. (5th Cir. 1991) that the court and opposing counsel were unable to locate in that opinion, i.e., a false/misattributed quote.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Mississippi, with the listed outcome: All claims dismissed with prejudice; warning.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Cunningham cited a purported D. Conn. opinion with a Westlaw citation and date that did not correspond to any docket entry for that case; the court concluded the representation of the Housatonic citation was fabricated. Outcome: All claims dismissed with prejudice; warning.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Mississippi, with the listed outcome: All claims dismissed with prejudice; warning.
Record details
MississippiSingle-state evidence scope
CourtN.D. Mississippi
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit5th Circuit
DateJan 7, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAll claims dismissed with prejudice; warning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
All claims dismissed with prejudice; warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cunningham cited a purported D. Conn. opinion with a Westlaw citation and date that did not correspond to any docket entry for that case; the court concluded the representation of the Housatonic citation was fabricated.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Cunningham attributed a specific quotation to International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's, Inc. (5th Cir. 1991) that the court and opposing counsel were unable to locate in that opinion, i.e., a false/misattributed quote.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Desmond Cunningham v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cunningham cited a purported D. Conn. opinion with a Westlaw citation and date that did not correspond to any docket entry for that case; the court concluded the representation of the Housatonic citation was fabricated. Outcome: All claims dismissed with prejudice; warning.
- Why does Desmond Cunningham v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Mississippi, with the listed outcome: All claims dismissed with prejudice; warning.
- What does the public record establish about Desmond Cunningham v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al.?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Desmond Cunningham v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.