HomeCasesDisciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025

Corte Suprema, Tercera Sala · Apr 22, 2026

ChileEditorial impact: career endingfake citationsbar referraltrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | First citation attributed to Jean Pierre Matus (one of the judges ...) in 'Responsabilidad Civil y Consumo, 2021' was doubted as authentic and formed part of the basis for the disciplinary complaint. Outcome: One-month suspension from practice; Monetary Fine.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is One-month suspension from practice; Monetary Fine; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving AI (implied, unspecified) with One-month suspension from practice; Monetary Fine in Corte Suprema, Tercera Sala, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving AI (implied, unspecified) with One-month suspension from practice; Monetary Fine in Corte Suprema, Tercera Sala, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCorte Suprema, Tercera Sala

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateApr 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOne-month suspension from practice; Monetary Fine

Known amount$1

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

One-month suspension from practice; Monetary Fine

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | First citation attributed to Jean Pierre Matus (one of the judges ...) in 'Responsabilidad Civil y Consumo, 2021' was doubted as authentic and formed part of the basis for the disciplinary complaint.
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Citation attributed to Juan Andrés Orrego Acuña as contained in 'Tratado de Protección al Consumidor, 2023' was questioned for authenticity; court found inaccurate sourcing and rejected the lawyer's 'involuntary error' defense.
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Second citation attributed to Jean Pierre Matus in 'Responsabilidad Civil y Consumo, 2021' was likewise questioned for authenticity and contributed to the finding of unprofessional conduct.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025?: Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | First citation attributed to Jean Pierre Matus (one of the judges ...) in 'Responsabilidad Civil y Consumo, 2021' was doubted as authentic and formed part of the basis for the disciplinary complaint. Outcome: One-month suspension from practice; Monetary Fine.
Why does Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025 matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving AI (implied, unspecified) with One-month suspension from practice; Monetary Fine in Corte Suprema, Tercera Sala, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Recurso de Suplicación 0005472/2025T.S.X. Galicia · Jul 7, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. RedstoneS.D. New York · Jun 9, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, et al.W.D. Tennessee · Jun 2, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)EML (a pseudonym) v AFT (a pseudonym) [2026] VCC 734County Court of Victoria · May 28, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)In re the Marriage of Amy Haddock and Justin Blu HaddockDC Oklahoma · May 21, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.E.D. California · Apr 22, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Citation attributed to Juan Andrés Orrego Acuña as contained in 'Tratado de Protección al Consumidor, 2023' was questioned for authenticity; court found inaccurate sourcing and rejected the lawyer's 'involuntary error' defense.

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Second citation attributed to Jean Pierre Matus in 'Responsabilidad Civil y Consumo, 2021' was likewise questioned for authenticity and contributed to the finding of unprofessional conduct.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025?

Why does Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025 matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025?

Which source supports this Disciplinary proceeding - Rol N°23.322-2025 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.