Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Ekeocha v. U.S. Department of State
D. DC · Nov 19, 2025
DC / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesimmigrationtrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Opposition cites "Litvin v. Blinken, 93 F.4th 1162, 1168 (D.C. Cir. 2024)", which the Court found does not appear to exist. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Opposition cites "Litvin v. Blinken, 93 F.4th 1162, 1168 (D.C. Cir. 2024)", which the Court found does not appear to exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's Opposition attributes a quotation to Nine Iraqi Allies... v. Kerry, 168 F. Supp. 3d 268, 289 (D.D.C. 2016) that does not appear in that opinion.
- Why it matters now
- Even a single fabricated D.C. Circuit cite earns an on-record admonishment — check every citation against the reporter.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Opposition cites "Litvin v. Blinken, 93 F.4th 1162, 1168 (D.C. Cir. 2024)", which the Court found does not appear to exist. Outcome: Admonishment.
Operational lesson
Even a single fabricated D.C. Circuit cite earns an on-record admonishment — check every citation against the reporter.
Record details
District of ColumbiaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. DC
Jurisdictionfederal
CircuitD.C. Circuit
DateNov 19, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Admonishment
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Opposition cites "Litvin v. Blinken, 93 F.4th 1162, 1168 (D.C. Cir. 2024)", which the Court found does not appear to exist.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's Opposition attributes a quotation to Nine Iraqi Allies... v. Kerry, 168 F. Supp. 3d 268, 289 (D.D.C. 2016) that does not appear in that opinion.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Ekeocha v. U.S. Department of State?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Opposition cites "Litvin v. Blinken, 93 F.4th 1162, 1168 (D.C. Cir. 2024)", which the Court found does not appear to exist. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why does Ekeocha v. U.S. Department of State matter for legal AI risk?
- Even a single fabricated D.C. Circuit cite earns an on-record admonishment — check every citation against the reporter.
- What does the public record establish about Ekeocha v. U.S. Department of State?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Ekeocha v. U.S. Department of State summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.