AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesHusni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al.
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al.

Supreme Court · Jan 1, 2026

IsraelEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsadministrativetrialMonetary
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The Israeli Supreme Court sanctioned a pro se litigant 500 ILS for submitting fabricated legal authorities in a motion. The court explicitly attributed the inclusion of these non-existent citations to the careless use of generative AI tools, warning that such conduct constitutes a serious obstruction of justice.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Supreme Court, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Why this matter is tracked

In Husni Al-Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al., the Israeli Supreme Court denied a motion to amend a judgment or reconsider costs. The court observed that the respondent, appearing pro se, included numerous non-existent legal authorities in his filing, which the court attributed to the use of generative AI. Emphasizing the duty of all litigants to verify the existence and accuracy of cited precedents, the court condemned the submission of fabricated references. Given the severity of the conduct but acknowledging the respondent's unrepresented status, the court imposed a modest monetary sanction of 500 ILS payable to the state treasury.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Supreme Court, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Record details

CourtSupreme Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJan 1, 2026
GE
AI toolGenerative AI (unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeThe motion was denied, and the respondent was ordered to pay 500 ILS to the state treasury as a sanction for submitting fabricated citations.
Known amount₪500
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

explicitly recorded

The court attributed the fabricated citations to AI hallucinations.

Procedural posture

The court issued a decision denying a motion to amend a judgment and for reconsideration of costs following the dismissal of an appeal.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law

Questions this record answers

What happened in Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al.?
The Israeli Supreme Court sanctioned a pro se litigant 500 ILS for submitting fabricated legal authorities in a motion. The court explicitly attributed the inclusion of these non-existent citations to the careless use of generative AI tools, warning that such conduct constitutes a serious obstruction of justice.
Why does Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Supreme Court, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
What does the public record establish about Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al.?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Chen v. Goodmore Investments & TawaSupreme Court · May 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsBen Cohen v. Ramat GanSupreme Court · Mar 22, 2026same court · fake citations + administrativeBen-Cohen v. Municipality of Ramat GanSupreme Court · Mar 22, 2026same court · fake citations + administrativeGummadi Usha Rani & Anr. v. Sure Mallikarjuna Rao & Anr.Supreme Court · Feb 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsJones v. Family Court at WhangareiSupreme Court · Feb 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Кіровоградській областіSupreme Court · Feb 3, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations