AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 25, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesIhor Chopko v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Ihor Chopko v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Jesse Schaefer; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

CA Arizona · Jan 27, 2026

AZ / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontractWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple fabricated quotations in appellant's briefs and described them as unsupported or false. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple fabricated quotations in appellant's briefs and described them as unsupported or false. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found fictitious case citations among appellant's legal citations (fictitious cases or false case citations) and noted substantial defects in those citations.
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Arizona, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple fabricated quotations in appellant's briefs and described them as unsupported or false. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Arizona, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore AZOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA Arizona
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateJan 27, 2026
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple fabricated quotations in appellant's briefs and described them as unsupported or false.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Court found fictitious case citations among appellant's legal citations (fictitious cases or false case citations) and noted substantial defects in those citations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ihor Chopko v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company?
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple fabricated quotations in appellant's briefs and described them as unsupported or false. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Ihor Chopko v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Arizona, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Ihor Chopko v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Ihor Chopko v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

In the Matter of the Estate of KuerschnerCA Arizona · Mar 5, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsIn the Matter of the Estate of Arturo LopezCA Arizona · Feb 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsIn re the Matter of: Abius Rosas CarreonCA Arizona · Feb 4, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsFairrow v. EastenCA Arizona · Aug 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsArrieta v. CervantesCA Arizona · Jul 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsEstate of ClaxtonCA Arizona · May 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.