HomeCasesIn re Eugene Ezra Perkins

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

In re Eugene Ezra Perkins

D. Oregon (Bankruptcy) · Jul 7, 2025

OR / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritybankruptcy

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Debtor described Walters as allowing amendment to retroactively change initial plan payments; court found Walters does not support that claim and was decided before BAPCPA. Outcome: Case dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Case dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Case dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied in D. Oregon (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Case dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied in D. Oregon (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Oregon (Bankruptcy)

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJul 7, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeCase dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Case dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Debtor described Walters as allowing amendment to retroactively change initial plan payments; court found Walters does not support that claim and was decided before BAPCPA.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Debtor relied on Cobb as supporting delayed payment relief; court found Cobb pre-dated BAPCPA and is distinguishable.
Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited a Vega-Lara citation and described a holding favorable to him; the court found the citation/number mismatched and that there is no Vega-Lara case saying what debtor claimed.
Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera, 597 F.3d 1' but the cited reporter/number corresponds to a different case; court found the citation incorrect/misleading.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re Eugene Ezra Perkins?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Debtor described Walters as allowing amendment to retroactively change initial plan payments; court found Walters does not support that claim and was decided before BAPCPA. Outcome: Case dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied.
Why does In re Eugene Ezra Perkins matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Case dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied in D. Oregon (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about In re Eugene Ezra Perkins?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this In re Eugene Ezra Perkins summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Chu v DarmaliFCA · Dec 8, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified JML Rose Pty Ltd v Jorgensen (No 3)Federal Court of Australia · Aug 19, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Kelly Bartholomew v. Clackamas CountyLUBA (Oregon) · Mar 19, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Troy Allen Berg v. Mandi Marie WondraD. Oregon · Dec 12, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Mary McGreevy v. Adam WitkinSC Oregon · Jun 4, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations In re Nicholia Cherry-CrocketteD. New Jersey (Bankruptcy) · May 20, 2026pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Oregon (Bankruptcy)

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJul 7, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeCase dismissed; motion to alter or amend denied

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Debtor described Walters as allowing amendment to retroactively change initial plan payments; court found Walters does not support that claim and was decided before BAPCPA.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Debtor relied on Cobb as supporting delayed payment relief; court found Cobb pre-dated BAPCPA and is distinguishable.

Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited a Vega-Lara citation and described a holding favorable to him; the court found the citation/number mismatched and that there is no Vega-Lara case saying what debtor claimed.

Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera, 597 F.3d 1' but the cited reporter/number corresponds to a different case; court found the citation incorrect/misleading.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re Eugene Ezra Perkins?

Why does In re Eugene Ezra Perkins matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about In re Eugene Ezra Perkins?

Which source supports this In re Eugene Ezra Perkins summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.