HomeCasesPut A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC

CA Washington · Mar 2, 2026

WA / stateEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotescontractappellate

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's opening brief included AI-generated erroneous citations and false quotations—mixing fictitious captions, misattributed citations, and legal principles not supported by the cited cases; attorneys admitted the citations were produced by 'AI-based search engines' and apologized to the court.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's opening brief included AI-generated erroneous citations and false quotations—mixing fictitious captions, misattributed citations, and legal principles not supported by the cited cases; attorneys admitted the citations were produced by 'AI-based search engines' and apologized to the court.
Why it matters now: Ban consumer AI search engines for appellate briefs; apologies don't erase fabricated captions on the record.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Ban consumer AI search engines for appellate briefs; apologies don't erase fabricated captions on the record.

Record details

WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Washington

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateMar 2, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's opening brief included AI-generated erroneous citations and false quotations—mixing fictitious captions, misattributed citations, and legal principles not supported by the cited cases; attorneys admitted the citations were produced by 'AI-based search engines' and apologized to the court.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC?: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's opening brief included AI-generated erroneous citations and false quotations—mixing fictitious captions, misattributed citations, and legal principles not supported by the cited cases; attorneys admitted the citations were produced by 'AI-based search engines' and apologized to the court.
Why does Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC matter for legal AI risk?: Ban consumer AI search engines for appellate briefs; apologies don't erase fabricated captions on the record.
What does the public record establish about Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Matthew Merz v. Harlyn Jenkins, Jillane Baros, Melinda Finn‑KamerathCA Washington · Jun 15, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Arthur West v. Lower Duwamish Waterway GroupCA Washington · Apr 20, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes In re the Marriage of YoungCA Washington · Jul 9, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate In the Matter of the Estate of CAROL M. CAREYCA Washington · Mar 3, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate Esterra Commons Venture, LLC dba Verde Esterra Park v. Justin NortonCA Washington (d1) · Mar 16, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes Patterson v. Nuvision Credit UnionCA California (4d) · Jul 2, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Ban consumer AI search engines for appellate briefs; apologies don't erase fabricated captions on the record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC?

Why does Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC matter for legal AI risk?

Ban consumer AI search engines for appellate briefs; apologies don't erase fabricated captions on the record.

What does the public record establish about Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC?

Which source supports this Put A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLC summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.