Which source supports this In re Mascio summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesIn re Mascio

Evidence review: primary document limited. The primary document was retrieved, but one or more case-level facts could not be tied to a page-located passage. The structured corpus baseline is preserved without upgrading those claims.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

In re Mascio

D. Colorado (Bankruptcy) · Aug 22, 2025

CO / federal Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations bankruptcy trial Warning

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited non-existent 'In re Simpson, 2008 WL 467698 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2008)'; court found no such case and that 2008 WL 467698 corresponds to Roby v. American Airlines, Inc. (9th Cir. 2008); court admonished debtor and cautioned about AI/Rule 11 compliance. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Colorado (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Colorado (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ColoradoSingle-state evidence scope

Explore COOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtD. Colorado (Bankruptcy)

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateAug 22, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited non-existent 'In re Simpson, 2008 WL 467698 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2008)'; court found no such case and that 2008 WL 467698 corresponds to Roby v. American Airlines, Inc. (9th Cir. 2008); court admonished debtor and cautioned about AI/Rule 11 compliance.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re Mascio?: Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited non-existent 'In re Simpson, 2008 WL 467698 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2008)'; court found no such case and that 2008 WL 467698 corresponds to Roby v. American Airlines, Inc. (9th Cir. 2008); court admonished debtor and cautioned about AI/Rule 11 compliance. Outcome: Warning.
Why does In re Mascio matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Colorado (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about In re Mascio?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this In re Mascio summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Keirton Inc. v. Mersad RahmanovicD. Colorado (Bankruptcy) · Mar 19, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations In re: Avi SchwalbD. Colorado (Bankruptcy) · Dec 2, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations In re: Sherry Ann McGannD. Colorado (Bankruptcy) · Oct 27, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations McDowell et al. v. TurpenD. Colorado (Bankruptcy) · Feb 17, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Danielle Maloit v. Frank Daniel MaloitD. Colorado · Jul 29, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Y.S. v. John Doe, et al.D. Colorado · Jun 4, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document limited

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 10, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 8, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open D. Colorado (Bankruptcy) profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology