Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
In re: Avi Schwalb
D. Colorado (Bankruptcy) · Dec 2, 2025
CO / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsbankruptcytrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'In re Plaza de Diego Shopping Ctr., 911 F.3d 820 (1st Cir. 2018)'; the Court determined that citation does not exist and noted a similarly named 1990 opinion at 911 F.2d 820 was inapplicable. Outcome: Court rejected reliance on the citation.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'In re Plaza de Diego Shopping Ctr., 911 F.3d 820 (1st Cir. 2018)'; the Court determined that citation does not exist and noted a similarly named 1990 opinion at 911 F.2d 820 was inapplicable.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado (Bankruptcy), with the listed outcome: Court rejected reliance on the citation.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'In re Plaza de Diego Shopping Ctr., 911 F.3d 820 (1st Cir. 2018)'; the Court determined that citation does not exist and noted a similarly named 1990 opinion at 911 F.2d 820 was inapplicable. Outcome: Court rejected reliance on the citation.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado (Bankruptcy), with the listed outcome: Court rejected reliance on the citation.
Record details
ColoradoSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Colorado (Bankruptcy)
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateDec 2, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeCourt rejected reliance on the citation
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Court rejected reliance on the citation
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'In re Plaza de Diego Shopping Ctr., 911 F.3d 820 (1st Cir. 2018)'; the Court determined that citation does not exist and noted a similarly named 1990 opinion at 911 F.2d 820 was inapplicable.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In re: Avi Schwalb?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'In re Plaza de Diego Shopping Ctr., 911 F.3d 820 (1st Cir. 2018)'; the Court determined that citation does not exist and noted a similarly named 1990 opinion at 911 F.2d 820 was inapplicable. Outcome: Court rejected reliance on the citation.
- Why does In re: Avi Schwalb matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Colorado (Bankruptcy), with the listed outcome: Court rejected reliance on the citation.
- What does the public record establish about In re: Avi Schwalb?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this In re: Avi Schwalb summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.