Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.
D. Nevada · Jan 15, 2026
NV / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefabricated quotesemploymenttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a statement about Rule 36 being self-executing to Asea v. Southern Pacific Transportation, but the Court determined the quoted language does not appear in that opinion as cited. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a statement about Rule 36 being self-executing to Asea v. Southern Pacific Transportation, but the Court determined the quoted language does not appear in that opinion as cited. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a burden-of-proof statement regarding sanctions to Marchand v. Mercy Medical Center, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in the cited opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quote about discovery transparency (custodians, search terms, time frame) to Apple v. Samsung, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in the cited opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation about reasonable ESI searches to the cited Facebook PPC order, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in that order. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quote about entitlement to know keyword searches to Apple v. Samsung, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in the cited opinion.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a statement about Rule 36 being self-executing to Asea v. Southern Pacific Transportation, but the Court determined the quoted language does not appear in that opinion as cited. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Record details
NevadaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Nevada
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateJan 15, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a statement about Rule 36 being self-executing to Asea v. Southern Pacific Transportation, but the Court determined the quoted language does not appear in that opinion as cited.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a burden-of-proof statement regarding sanctions to Marchand v. Mercy Medical Center, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in the cited opinion.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quote about discovery transparency (custodians, search terms, time frame) to Apple v. Samsung, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in the cited opinion.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation about reasonable ESI searches to the cited Facebook PPC order, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in that order.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quote about entitlement to know keyword searches to Apple v. Samsung, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in the cited opinion.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a statement about Rule 36 being self-executing to Asea v. Southern Pacific Transportation, but the Court determined the quoted language does not appear in that opinion as cited. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.
- What does the public record establish about James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.