Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Madame [W] [Y] c. CPAM du Loiret
TJ Orléans · Apr 9, 2026
FranceEditorial impact: lowfake citationsadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | The claimant cited 'jurisprudences purement fantaisiste' (manifestly invented case law) to argue a defect of motivation; the court characterized these citations as invented and akin to an AI hallucination and did not rely on them. Outcome: Rejected requests and condemned claimant to costs.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Rejected requests and condemned claimant to costs; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and administrative involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Rejected requests and condemned claimant to costs in TJ Orléans, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | The claimant cited 'jurisprudences purement fantaisiste' (manifestly invented case law) to argue a defect of motivation; the court characterized these citations as invented and akin to an AI hallucination and did not rely on them. Outcome: Rejected requests and condemned claimant to costs.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and administrative involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Rejected requests and condemned claimant to costs in TJ Orléans, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtTJ Orléans
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateApr 9, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeRejected requests and condemned claimant to costs
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Rejected requests and condemned claimant to costs
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The claimant cited 'jurisprudences purement fantaisiste' (manifestly invented case law) to argue a defect of motivation; the court characterized these citations as invented and akin to an AI hallucination and did not rely on them.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Madame [W] [Y] c. CPAM du Loiret?
- Fabricated: Case Law | The claimant cited 'jurisprudences purement fantaisiste' (manifestly invented case law) to argue a defect of motivation; the court characterized these citations as invented and akin to an AI hallucination and did not rely on them. Outcome: Rejected requests and condemned claimant to costs.
- Why does Madame [W] [Y] c. CPAM du Loiret matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and administrative involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Rejected requests and condemned claimant to costs in TJ Orléans, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Madame [W] [Y] c. CPAM du Loiret?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Madame [W] [Y] c. CPAM du Loiret summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.