AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 9, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 6, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesMary-Rose F. Calenzo v. Waste Management, Inc.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Mary-Rose F. Calenzo v. Waste Management, Inc.

N.D. New York · Aug 5, 2026

NY / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrialWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this opinion in opposition; the Court was unable to locate or verify it and treated it as nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in N.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this opinion in opposition; the Court was unable to locate or verify it and treated it as nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in N.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtN.D. New York
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateAug 5, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this opinion in opposition; the Court was unable to locate or verify it and treated it as nonexistent.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this opinion in opposition; the Court was unable to locate or verify it and treated it as nonexistent.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this opinion in opposition; the Court was unable to locate or verify it and treated it as nonexistent.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this opinion in opposition; the Court was unable to locate or verify it and treated it as nonexistent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Mary-Rose F. Calenzo v. Waste Management, Inc.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this opinion in opposition; the Court was unable to locate or verify it and treated it as nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Mary-Rose F. Calenzo v. Waste Management, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in N.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Mary-Rose F. Calenzo v. Waste Management, Inc.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Mary-Rose F. Calenzo v. Waste Management, Inc. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos PizzaN.D. New York · Sep 17, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsSmith v. Clarence Smith et al.N.D. New York · Dec 22, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsLinda Oliver v. Christian DribuschN.D. New York · Nov 21, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsJeri'yah Ford v. Troy City School District, et al.N.D. New York · Mar 4, 2026same court · fake citations + trialRule v. BraimanN.D. New York · Sep 4, 2024same court · pro se + trialFernando Justino Santana v. Shook Hardy & Bacon, et al.S.D. New York · Jul 31, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations