HomeCasesJeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza

N.D. New York · Sep 17, 2025

NY / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff included the fictitious citation 'Lynch v. U.S. Postal Service, 2016 WL 7338415 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2016)'; court found the Westlaw citation actually corresponds to Green v. New York, No. 14-cv-2073, 2016 WL 7338415 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2016), and no Lynch decision by this court in 2016. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Warning in N.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Warning in N.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. New York

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateSep 17, 2025

AI toolChatGPT

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff included the fictitious citation 'Lynch v. U.S. Postal Service, 2016 WL 7338415 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2016)'; court found the Westlaw citation actually corresponds to Green v. New York, No. 14-cv-2073, 2016 WL 7338415 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2016), and no Lynch decision by this court in 2016.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff included the fictitious citation 'Lynch v. U.S. Postal Service, 2016 WL 7338415 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2016)'; court found the Westlaw citation actually corresponds to Green v. New York, No. 14-cv-2073, 2016 WL 7338415 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2016), and no Lynch decision by this court in 2016. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Warning in N.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Smith v. Clarence Smith et al.N.D. New York · Dec 22, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Linda Oliver v. Christian DribuschN.D. New York · Nov 21, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Jeri'yah Ford v. Troy City School District, et al.N.D. New York · Mar 4, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Rule v. BraimanN.D. New York · Sep 4, 2024same court · pro se + trial Beedemariam Kassaw v. Wal-Mart CorporationW.D. New York · Mar 30, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Yakov Magdalasov v. ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc., and Maria MalvarS.D. New York · Nov 24, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Warning in N.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza?

Why does Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza matter for legal AI risk?

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving ChatGPT with Warning in N.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

What does the public record establish about Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza?

Which source supports this Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos Pizza summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.