Which source supports this Rule v. Braiman summary?

The recorded source is casemine.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesRule v. Braiman

Evidence review: source unavailable. The linked source could not be retrieved during the latest evidence pass. This page preserves the structured corpus baseline and states the gap explicitly.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 70/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Rule v. Braiman

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); linked document: casemine.com. What AI Vortex adds.

N.D. New York · Sep 4, 2024

NY / federal Editorial impact: low pro se trial Warning

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Outcome: Warning. The matter is recorded in N.D. New York on 2024-09-04 and concerns pro se and trial. The tracked outcome is Warning; consult the linked source for the complete record.

Why the court cared: The linked record identifies pro se and trial and records Warning. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and trial involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in N.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Outcome: Warning. The matter is recorded in N.D. New York on 2024-09-04 and concerns pro se and trial. The tracked outcome is Warning; consult the linked source for the complete record.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and trial involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in N.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtN.D. New York

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateSep 4, 2024

AI toolNo tool named in source

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Rule v. Braiman?: Outcome: Warning. The matter is recorded in N.D. New York on 2024-09-04 and concerns pro se and trial. The tracked outcome is Warning; consult the linked source for the complete record.
Why does Rule v. Braiman matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and trial involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in N.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Rule v. Braiman?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Rule v. Braiman summary?: The recorded source is casemine.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Mulqueen v. CoddingtonN.D. New York · Sep 23, 2026same court · pro se + trial Mary-Rose F. Calenzo v. Waste Management, Inc.N.D. New York · Aug 5, 2026same court · pro se + trial Smith v. Clarence Smith et al.N.D. New York · Dec 22, 2025same court · pro se + trial Linda Oliver v. Christian DribuschN.D. New York · Nov 21, 2025same court · pro se + trial Jeramiah Brown v. Fat Dough Incorp., doing business as Dominos PizzaN.D. New York · Sep 17, 2025same court · pro se + trial Jeri'yah Ford v. Troy City School District, et al.N.D. New York · Mar 4, 2026same court · trial

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Linked evidence record

casemine.com

Secondary or other linked source
The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statussource unavailable

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Oct 26, 2026; latest tracked decision Oct 23, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open N.D. New York profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Case Record: Rule v. Braiman (September 4, 2024), Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases/rule-v-braiman-2024-09-04 (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Case Record: Rule v. Braiman (September 4, 2024). Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases/rule-v-braiman-2024-09-04
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases/rule-v-braiman-2024-09-04 (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.