Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Oready, LLC (2)
GAO · Sep 25, 2025
/ federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrative
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited Trailboss Enterprises, B-417212.2; GAO found no such decision exists and protester’s 'typo' explanation was unpersuasive. Outcome: Protests dismissed for abuse. Actually the fourth order in that case that pertains to hallucinations; a first, June 5 Order is only mentioned in a second, June 18 order that does not call out what appears to be hallucinated references.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Protests dismissed for abuse; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Protests dismissed for abuse in GAO, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited Trailboss Enterprises, B-417212.2; GAO found no such decision exists and protester’s 'typo' explanation was unpersuasive. Outcome: Protests dismissed for abuse. Actually the fourth order in that case that pertains to hallucinations; a first, June 5 Order is only mentioned in a second, June 18 order that does not call out what appears to be hallucinated references.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Protests dismissed for abuse in GAO, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtGAO
Jurisdictionfederal
CircuitNot recorded
DateSep 25, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeProtests dismissed for abuse
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Protests dismissed for abuse
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited Trailboss Enterprises, B-417212.2; GAO found no such decision exists and protester’s 'typo' explanation was unpersuasive.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'JRS Staffing Services, B-409407.7, Apr. 2, 2014, 2014 CPD ¶ 116'; GAO found no such B-number and the CPD ¶116 actually corresponds to a different decision (Government and Military Certification Sys., B-409420).
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Protester cited Kathpal Technologies, Inc., B-291637.2 claiming it sustained a protest about letters of intent; GAO found the Kathpal decision exists but does not address letters of intent and in fact denied a post-award past-performance challenge.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited System Studies & Simulation, Inc., B-416693; GAO found no such decision exists.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited JRS Staffing Services, B-409407 to support claim about unstated evaluation criteria; GAO found no decision using that party with B-409407 (B-409407 corresponds to JCMS) and the cited proposition is unsupported.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Oready, LLC (2)?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited Trailboss Enterprises, B-417212.2; GAO found no such decision exists and protester’s 'typo' explanation was unpersuasive. Outcome: Protests dismissed for abuse. Actually the fourth order in that case that pertains to hallucinations; a first, June 5 Order is only mentioned in a second, June 18 order that does not call out what appears to be hallucinated references.
- Why does Oready, LLC (2) matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Protests dismissed for abuse in GAO, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Oready, LLC (2)?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Oready, LLC (2) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.