Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Megan E. Bryan v. Child Support Enforcement Agency, State of Hawaiʻi
SC Hawaiʻi · Mar 30, 2026
SC / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfamilytrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited non-existent 'State v. Burdett' as a 1981 opinion at 63 Haw. 357; the actual case at that citation is State v. Masaniai, 63 Haw. 354, 628 P.2d 1018 (1981), which does not address family court jurisdiction. Court found the citation fabricated and unsupported. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Reporter-number mismatches are the single fastest tell of an AI hallucination — check the volume, not just the name.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited non-existent 'State v. Burdett' as a 1981 opinion at 63 Haw. 357; the actual case at that citation is State v. Masaniai, 63 Haw. 354, 628 P.2d 1018 (1981), which does not address family court jurisdiction. Court found the citation fabricated and unsupported. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
Reporter-number mismatches are the single fastest tell of an AI hallucination — check the volume, not just the name.
Record details
South CarolinaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC Hawaiʻi
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit4th Circuit
DateMar 30, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited non-existent 'State v. Burdett' as a 1981 opinion at 63 Haw. 357; the actual case at that citation is State v. Masaniai, 63 Haw. 354, 628 P.2d 1018 (1981), which does not address family court jurisdiction. Court found the citation fabricated and unsupported.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Petition included four additional inaccurate or non-existent case citations that did not support the propositions for which they were cited; court characterized these as hallucinated citations.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Megan E. Bryan v. Child Support Enforcement Agency, State of Hawaiʻi?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited non-existent 'State v. Burdett' as a 1981 opinion at 63 Haw. 357; the actual case at that citation is State v. Masaniai, 63 Haw. 354, 628 P.2d 1018 (1981), which does not address family court jurisdiction. Court found the citation fabricated and unsupported. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Megan E. Bryan v. Child Support Enforcement Agency, State of Hawaiʻi matter for legal AI risk?
- Reporter-number mismatches are the single fastest tell of an AI hallucination — check the volume, not just the name.
- What does the public record establish about Megan E. Bryan v. Child Support Enforcement Agency, State of Hawaiʻi?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Megan E. Bryan v. Child Support Enforcement Agency, State of Hawaiʻi summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.