HomeCasesMeriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc.

C.D. California · Mar 16, 2026

CA / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsiptrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Jorgensen v. CBS, Inc., 728 F.2d 958 (8th Cir. 1984),' which the Court found does not exist and misrepresents the reporter citation (728 F.2d 953 is United States v. Johns (7th Cir. 1984)). Court treated the citation as a fabricated authority. Outcome: Factor in dismissing with prejudice.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Factor in dismissing with prejudice; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Factor in dismissing with prejudice in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Factor in dismissing with prejudice in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtC.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateMar 16, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeFactor in dismissing with prejudice

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Factor in dismissing with prejudice

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Jorgensen v. CBS, Inc., 728 F.2d 958 (8th Cir. 1984),' which the Court found does not exist and misrepresents the reporter citation (728 F.2d 953 is United States v. Johns (7th Cir. 1984)). Court treated the citation as a fabricated authority.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Lamon v. Godbolt, 2015 WL 13647670 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2015),' which the Court found to be nonexistent in the Central District and the Westlaw number refers to an unrelated state-court matter; Court treated this as a fabricated/fictitious citation.
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Unauthorized supplemental brief (Dkt. 64) contained images with nonsensical spellings and text (e.g., 'Twombly/idqal + Three Bays'; 'Comedie Freeze'), which the Court identified as likely generated by AI and therefore fabricated exhibit content.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Jorgensen v. CBS, Inc., 728 F.2d 958 (8th Cir. 1984),' which the Court found does not exist and misrepresents the reporter citation (728 F.2d 953 is United States v. Johns (7th Cir. 1984)). Court treated the citation as a fabricated authority. Outcome: Factor in dismissing with prejudice.
Why does Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Factor in dismissing with prejudice in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.C.D. California · Jul 2, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Lagac v. Capital One, N.A.C.D. California · May 22, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Oscar Danilo Montealto Garcia v. Todd Lyons, et al.C.D. California · May 14, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations James Jordan v. USA, Clinicas Del Camino Real, Inc., et al.C.D. California · Apr 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Jared Ashcraft v. First-Citizens Bank and Trust Company, et al.C.D. California · Mar 25, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations TQJ, LLC v. Jennifer Esquivel et al.C.D. California · Feb 12, 2026same court · fake citations + ip

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtC.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateMar 16, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeFactor in dismissing with prejudice

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Lamon v. Godbolt, 2015 WL 13647670 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2015),' which the Court found to be nonexistent in the Central District and the Westlaw number refers to an unrelated state-court matter; Court treated this as a fabricated/fictitious citation.

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Unauthorized supplemental brief (Dkt. 64) contained images with nonsensical spellings and text (e.g., 'Twombly/idqal + Three Bays'; 'Comedie Freeze'), which the Court identified as likely generated by AI and therefore fabricated exhibit content.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc.?

Why does Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc.?

Which source supports this Meriland Keith Dillard v. CBS Studios, Inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.