HomeCasesMinhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al.

S.D. New York · Jul 15, 2026

NY / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsbar referralcivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney Jae S. Lee included a citation to a non-existent case generated by GPT-3.5 in a reply brief; the Second Circuit referred Lee to the Grievance Panel and Committee for that fabricated citation and the court treated the referral as a judicial act within its jurisdiction. Outcome: Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving GPT-3.5 with Bar Referral in S.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving GPT-3.5 with Bar Referral in S.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. New York

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateJul 15, 2026

AI toolGPT-3.5

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeBar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

GPT-3.5 is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney Jae S. Lee included a citation to a non-existent case generated by GPT-3.5 in a reply brief; the Second Circuit referred Lee to the Grievance Panel and Committee for that fabricated citation and the court treated the referral as a judicial act within its jurisdiction.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney Jae S. Lee included a citation to a non-existent case generated by GPT-3.5 in a reply brief; the Second Circuit referred Lee to the Grievance Panel and Committee for that fabricated citation and the court treated the referral as a judicial act within its jurisdiction. Outcome: Bar Referral.
Why does Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving GPT-3.5 with Bar Referral in S.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Cartagena v. Dixon, Blackburn, and T.A. Blackburn Law (2)S.D. New York · Jul 10, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referral Jason Wimberly v. Verizon New York Inc.S.D. New York · Jun 12, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rights LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. RedstoneS.D. New York · Jun 9, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referral Hodges v. McGough Enterprises LLCS.D. New York · May 26, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rights Mercy Wellington v. City of New YorkS.D. New York · Apr 30, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rights Sai Malena Jimenez-Fogarty v. Thomas Fogarty et al.S.D. New York · Apr 29, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rights

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving GPT-3.5 with Bar Referral in S.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al.?

Why does Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving GPT-3.5 with Bar Referral in S.D. New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

What does the public record establish about Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al.?

Which source supports this Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.