Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 11, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 9, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
ChatGPT / OpenAI logo
Source-linked corpus view

ChatGPT

A conversational AI assistant used for drafting, analysis, research support, and other natural-language tasks. ChatGPT appears in 134 of 2,038 public corpus records (6.6%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

ProviderOpenAI
Product categoryGeneral-purpose AI assistant
Product referenceOfficial product site
Evidence boundaryNamed only where recorded
Matched records134
Corpus denominator2,038
Source linked99.3%
Latest trackedSep 9, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What issues and consequences appear in records that identify ChatGPT?

AI Vortex currently links 134 source-linked public matters that identify ChatGPT. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (110), Misrepresented authority (55) and Fabricated or altered quotations (44). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (50), No adjudicated consequence recorded (44) and Professional discipline (32). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the tool.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities110 records
Leading recorded responseMonetary sanction50 records
Known numeric amounts$305,22930 known · 20 unquantified
Recorded date rangeApr 14, 2023through Sep 9, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 134 matching records.

Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. Utah · UT · ClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini
Sep 9, 2026
Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (2)D. Arizona · AZ · ChatGPT
Aug 24, 2026
Unspecified murder appeal (Las Cruces area)New Mexico SC · NM · ChatGPT
Aug 21, 2026
Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (2)W.D. Washington · WA · Claude and ChatGPT
Aug 18, 2026
Brankle v. SchmellCA Indiana · IN · ChatGPT
Aug 14, 2026
IN RE: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability LitigationD. Arizona · AZ · ChatGPT
Aug 12, 2026
A. P. v. S. K.CA Québec · Canada · ChatGPT
Aug 11, 2026
Hack v. Preston et alD. Utah · UT · ChatGPT
Aug 7, 2026
Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National AssociationD. Connecticut · CT · Gemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPT
Aug 5, 2026
Barteca Holdings v. TacobarnD. Connecticut · CT · Open Law; Claude; ChatGPT
Aug 4, 2026
TOV Realty, LLC v. Suarez; Kosel Equity, LLC v. MacGregorSC Connecticut · CT · ChatGPT
Jul 31, 2026
Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Comm’nCA Illinois · IL · ChatGPT
Jul 28, 2026
Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (1)W.D. Washington · WA · ChatGPT, Claude
Jul 24, 2026
Asif v Minister for Immigration and CitizenshipFedCFam · Australia · ChatGPT
Jul 22, 2026
Minhye Park v. Hon. Barrington D. Parker, et al.S.D. New York · NY · GPT-3.5
Jul 15, 2026
Heriberto Perez-Castillo v. Todd W. Blanche7th Cir. CA · US · ChatGPT
Jun 1, 2026
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. ReevesSC Oklahoma · OK · ChatGPT
May 27, 2026
Jackie L. Miller v. Regions BankN.D. Alabama · AL · ChatGPT
May 21, 2026
That Xiong v. Minga Wofford (2)E.D. California · CA · ChatGPT
May 21, 2026
Leung v Omnia Inclusive Employment Solutions LtdFederal Court · Australia · ChatGPT
May 15, 2026
Barber v. MorawaCA Michigan · MI · Claude, ChatGPT, Westlaw, Lexis
May 5, 2026
Jessica Fuller v. Hyde School, et al.D. Maine · ME · Claude or ChatGPT
May 5, 2026
Richard Paul Smith v. Verra Mobility Corporation et al.M.D. Florida · FL · ChatGPT
May 1, 2026
Boonstra v Edmonton (City)Court of King’s Bench of Alberta · Canada · ChatGPT
Apr 21, 2026
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Product names and marks identify recorded tools only. AI Vortex does not imply vendor affiliation, endorsement, product-wide failure rates, or involvement beyond the linked public records. OpenAI and ChatGPT marks are the property of OpenAI and are used only to identify the product named in the public record.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.