AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesNelson Henry v. Joseph Iannone and James Deacetis
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Nelson Henry v. Joseph Iannone and James Deacetis

S.D. Florida · Jan 27, 2026

FL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefabricated quotescivil rightstrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court identified that the pro se plaintiff included hallucinated case law quotations in his objections to a magistrate judge's report. The court explicitly stated that the cited passages from Sims v. Metro. Dade Cnty. and Shaw v. City of Selma do not appear in those opinions and were used to incorrectly challenge the court's reliance on video evidence.

Why the court cared
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Sims v. Metro. Dade Cnty. that the court found does not appear in that opinion and was used to argue summary-judgment standards regarding video evidence. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on a purported quotation from Shaw v. City of Selma that the court characterized as among the plaintiff's seemingly hallucinated quotations from case law.
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

In a civil rights action, the pro se plaintiff submitted objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation for summary judgment. The court noted that the plaintiff's objections relied on fabricated case law, specifically citing purported quotations from Sims v. Metro. Dade Cnty. and Shaw v. City of Selma that do not exist in the actual opinions. The court observed that the plaintiff used these hallucinated quotes to argue against the application of the summary judgment standard regarding video evidence. The district court accepted the magistrate's report, granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the plaintiff's claims, noting that the plaintiff's reliance on non-existent case law was meritless.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore FLOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtS.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateJan 27, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeThe court accepted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the plaintiff's claims.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

The district court reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation de novo following the pro se plaintiff's timely objections. The court accepted the report and granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Sims v. Metro. Dade Cnty. that the court found does not appear in that opinion and was used to argue summary-judgment standards regarding video evidence.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on a purported quotation from Shaw v. City of Selma that the court characterized as among the plaintiff's seemingly hallucinated quotations from case law.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nelson Henry v. Joseph Iannone and James Deacetis?
The court identified that the pro se plaintiff included hallucinated case law quotations in his objections to a magistrate judge's report. The court explicitly stated that the cited passages from Sims v. Metro. Dade Cnty. and Shaw v. City of Selma do not appear in those opinions and were used to incorrectly challenge the court's reliance on video evidence.
Why does Nelson Henry v. Joseph Iannone and James Deacetis matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about Nelson Henry v. Joseph Iannone and James Deacetis?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Nelson Henry v. Joseph Iannone and James Deacetis summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Mitchell Taylor Button & Dusty Button v. Sigrid McCawleyS.D. Florida · Feb 4, 2026same court · pro se + fabricated quotesAyatollah Hylton v. Chivone Janee Hylton, et al.S.D. Florida · Jan 5, 2026same court · pro se + fabricated quotesCrespo v. Tesla, Inc.S.D. Florida · Jun 30, 2025same court · pro se + fabricated quotesJorge A. Zea v. National Association of REALTORSS.D. Florida · Mar 24, 2026same court · pro se + fabricated quotesDavid Morris Clayman v. Scott BessantS.D. Florida · Nov 24, 2025same court · pro se + civil rightsJoseph C. Zoghaib v. Societe Generale De Banque Au Liban, et al.S.D. Florida · Apr 8, 2026same court · pro se + trial