HomeCasesNicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.

D. Nevada · Dec 30, 2025

NV / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the proposition that a defaulted corporation 'lacks standing to defend or prosecute actions until reinstated' to Executive Management Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.; the court found no such quote or related holding in that opinion. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the proposition that a defaulted corporation 'lacks standing to defend or prosecute actions until reinstated' to Executive Management Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.; the court found no such quote or related holding in that opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Chi v. Nevada Employment Security Division, 2020 WL 708272 (D. Nev. Feb. 12, 2020)'; the court found no case by that title and that the Westlaw citation corresponded to a West Virginia legislative bill.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Nevada

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 30, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the proposition that a defaulted corporation 'lacks standing to defend or prosecute actions until reinstated' to Executive Management Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.; the court found no such quote or related holding in that opinion.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Chi v. Nevada Employment Security Division, 2020 WL 708272 (D. Nev. Feb. 12, 2020)'; the court found no case by that title and that the Westlaw citation corresponded to a West Virginia legislative bill.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the proposition that a defaulted corporation 'lacks standing to defend or prosecute actions until reinstated' to Executive Management Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.; the court found no such quote or related holding in that opinion. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Anthony Wallace v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC, et al.D. Nevada · Mar 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Coleman & Lewis v. PNC Bank, N.A.D. Nevada · Nov 5, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Preston House v. TH Foods, Inc.D. Nevada · Jun 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Seeto v. KendallD. Nevada · May 5, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Wendy Wolkenstein and Rebecca Knepp v. Dan Heinrich and Samual TilleryD. Nevada · Apr 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Edward C. Allen v. Western Governors University, et al.D. Nevada · Mar 31, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Nevada

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 30, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Chi v. Nevada Employment Security Division, 2020 WL 708272 (D. Nev. Feb. 12, 2020)'; the court found no case by that title and that the Westlaw citation corresponded to a West Virginia legislative bill.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.?

Why does Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.?

Which source supports this Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.