Which source supports this Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesNicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.

Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.

Corpus matter record

Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.

D. Nevada · Dec 30, 2025

NV / federal Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations fabricated quotes contract Warning

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court issued a formal warning to the pro se plaintiff regarding the submission of fabricated case law and misrepresented citations. The court explicitly noted that these errors might stem from the misuse of artificial intelligence and cautioned that future occurrences would result in sanctions, potentially including case-terminating penalties.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the proposition that a defaulted corporation 'lacks standing to defend or prosecute actions until reinstated' to Executive Management Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.; the court found no such quote or related holding in that opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Chi v. Nevada Employment Security Division, 2020 WL 708272 (D. Nev. Feb. 12, 2020)'; the court found no case by that title and that the Westlaw citation corresponded to a West Virginia legislative bill.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

In a civil action, the court addressed procedural deficiencies regarding service of process and the plaintiff's reliance on non-existent legal authorities. The plaintiff cited Executive Management Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Co. for a proposition regarding corporate standing that did not appear in the opinion, and cited a non-existent case, Chi v. Nevada Employment Security Division, which corresponded to a West Virginia legislative bill. The court cautioned the pro se plaintiff that misrepresented citations, potentially resulting from the misuse of artificial intelligence, would not be tolerated. The court warned that future errors could lead to sanctions, including case-terminating sanctions, while granting the defendant's motion to quash service for failure to comply with state procedural requirements.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Explore NVOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtD. Nevada

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 30, 2025

AI toolAI (unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeThe court granted the motion to quash service as to one defendant and issued a formal warning to the plaintiff regarding the use of fabricated citations and AI-generated content.

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

implied

The court referenced the plaintiff's potential misuse of Artificial Intelligence.

Procedural posture

The court ruled on a Motion to Quash Service filed by defendants, granting the motion in part and denying it in part, while simultaneously issuing a warning regarding the plaintiff's use of AI-generated citations.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the proposition that a defaulted corporation 'lacks standing to defend or prosecute actions until reinstated' to Executive Management Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.; the court found no such quote or related holding in that opinion.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Chi v. Nevada Employment Security Division, 2020 WL 708272 (D. Nev. Feb. 12, 2020)'; the court found no case by that title and that the Westlaw citation corresponded to a West Virginia legislative bill.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.?: The court issued a formal warning to the pro se plaintiff regarding the submission of fabricated case law and misrepresented citations. The court explicitly noted that these errors might stem from the misuse of artificial intelligence and cautioned that future occurrences would result in sanctions, potentially including case-terminating penalties.
Why does Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Anthony Wallace v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC, et al.D. Nevada · Mar 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Coleman & Lewis v. PNC Bank, N.A.D. Nevada · Nov 5, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Kelly v. Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityD. Nevada · Aug 19, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Preston House v. TH Foods, Inc.D. Nevada · Jun 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Seeto v. KendallD. Nevada · May 5, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Wendy Wolkenstein and Rebecca Knepp v. Dan Heinrich and Samual TilleryD. Nevada · Apr 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document verified

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 10, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 8, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open D. Nevada profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology