Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
OS-DB-JV-2, LLC
GAO · Jun 16, 2026
/ federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | One of four cited GAO decisions could not be located; protester later admitted the citation was erroneous and introduced via research software/AI. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and administrative involving Unidentified with Warning in GAO, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | One of four cited GAO decisions could not be located; protester later admitted the citation was erroneous and introduced via research software/AI. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and administrative involving Unidentified with Warning in GAO, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtGAO
Jurisdictionfederal
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 16, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | One of four cited GAO decisions could not be located; protester later admitted the citation was erroneous and introduced via research software/AI.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Second cited GAO decision could not be verified; GAO requested copies and protester acknowledged error from software tools.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Third cited GAO decision was unlocatable; GAO found hallmarks of LLM/AI generation and protester apologized for the erroneous citation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fourth cited GAO decision could not be found; protester attributed the inclusion to software-assisted research and accepted responsibility.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in OS-DB-JV-2, LLC?
- Fabricated: Case Law | One of four cited GAO decisions could not be located; protester later admitted the citation was erroneous and introduced via research software/AI. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does OS-DB-JV-2, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and administrative involving Unidentified with Warning in GAO, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about OS-DB-JV-2, LLC?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this OS-DB-JV-2, LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.