Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Tony Pete Flores, et al.
D. Nevada · Jun 18, 2026
NV / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesothertrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Submission included authorities that the Court describes as fabricated or non-existent case law cited in Defendants' motions. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Unidentified with Warning in D. Nevada, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Submission included authorities that the Court describes as fabricated or non-existent case law cited in Defendants' motions. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Unidentified with Warning in D. Nevada, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
NevadaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Nevada
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateJun 18, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Submission included authorities that the Court describes as fabricated or non-existent case law cited in Defendants' motions.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Motions quoted authorities with inaccurate or fabricated language (false quotes/misquotations of existing authorities).
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Tony Pete Flores, et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Submission included authorities that the Court describes as fabricated or non-existent case law cited in Defendants' motions. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Tony Pete Flores, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Unidentified with Warning in D. Nevada, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Tony Pete Flores, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Tony Pete Flores, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.