AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesSita v. Champlain Housing Trust
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Sita v. Champlain Housing Trust

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); linked document: storage.courtlistener.com. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

D. Vermont · May 21, 2026

VT / federalEditorial impact: highpro sefake citationstrialMonetary
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited non-existent legal authority in multiple filings Outcome: Adverse Costs Order. The judgment surfaced in a subsequent case, also dismissed as vexatious (see here).

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Adverse Costs Order in D. Vermont. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited non-existent legal authority in multiple filings Outcome: Adverse Costs Order. The judgment surfaced in a subsequent case, also dismissed as vexatious (see here).

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Adverse Costs Order in D. Vermont. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

VermontSingle-state evidence scope
Explore VTOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. Vermont
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateMay 21, 2026
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAdverse Costs Order
Known amount$11,799
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Adverse Costs Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited non-existent legal authority in multiple filings

Questions this record answers

What happened in Sita v. Champlain Housing Trust?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited non-existent legal authority in multiple filings Outcome: Adverse Costs Order. The judgment surfaced in a subsequent case, also dismissed as vexatious (see here).
Why does Sita v. Champlain Housing Trust matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Adverse Costs Order in D. Vermont. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Sita v. Champlain Housing Trust?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Sita v. Champlain Housing Trust summary?
The recorded source is CourtListener / RECAP. It is classified as docket or legal-document mirror; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Rivard v. Vermont Dept. of CorrectionsSC Vermont · Aug 14, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsCheryl O’Donnell v. Hope CloughSC Vermont · Jul 10, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsLafayette v. WintersVermont SC · Jan 7, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsFitzgerald v. BradyVermont SC · Dec 23, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsRobert Lafayette v. Alex Abrami et alVermont SC · Dec 18, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsRivard v. Dept. of CorrectionsVermont SC · Dec 10, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow