Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Specter Aviation Limited v. Laprade
CS Québec · Oct 1, 2025
CanadaEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Contest filed by Respondent included (at least eight) non-existent case authorities generated by AI; opposing counsel identified the irregularity and Court treated them as fabricated citations constituting serious procedural misconduct. Outcome: Monetary sanction for procedural misconduct. Monsieur Laprade filed a contestation containing multiple citations to non-existent authorities generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence. The Court found these to be fabricated (so-called "hallucinated") citations, constituting a manquement important to the conduct of the proceeding under art. 342 C.p.c., and imposed a 5,000$ sanction.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary sanction for procedural misconduct; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Quebec CS is imposing 5,000$ art.342 sanctions on pro-se AI filers; low bar for fabrication-based costs.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Contest filed by Respondent included (at least eight) non-existent case authorities generated by AI; opposing counsel identified the irregularity and Court treated them as fabricated citations constituting serious procedural misconduct. Outcome: Monetary sanction for procedural misconduct. Monsieur Laprade filed a contestation containing multiple citations to non-existent authorities generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence. The Court found these to be fabricated (so-called "hallucinated") citations, constituting a manquement important to the conduct of the proceeding under art. 342 C.p.c., and imposed a 5,000$ sanction.
Operational lesson
Quebec CS is imposing 5,000$ art.342 sanctions on pro-se AI filers; low bar for fabrication-based costs.
Record details
CourtCS Québec
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 1, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMonetary sanction for procedural misconduct
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Monetary sanction for procedural misconduct
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Contest filed by Respondent included (at least eight) non-existent case authorities generated by AI; opposing counsel identified the irregularity and Court treated them as fabricated citations constituting serious procedural misconduct.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Specter Aviation Limited v. Laprade?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Contest filed by Respondent included (at least eight) non-existent case authorities generated by AI; opposing counsel identified the irregularity and Court treated them as fabricated citations constituting serious procedural misconduct. Outcome: Monetary sanction for procedural misconduct. Monsieur Laprade filed a contestation containing multiple citations to non-existent authorities generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence. The Court found these to be fabricated (so-called "hallucinated") citations, constituting a manquement important to the conduct of the proceeding under art. 342 C.p.c., and imposed a 5,000$ sanction.
- Why does Specter Aviation Limited v. Laprade matter for legal AI risk?
- Quebec CS is imposing 5,000$ art.342 sanctions on pro-se AI filers; low bar for fabrication-based costs.
- What does the public record establish about Specter Aviation Limited v. Laprade?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Specter Aviation Limited v. Laprade summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.