Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 26, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesKalala v. Coopérative d'habitation La Fraternité Micheloise
Evidence review: source unavailable. The linked source could not be retrieved during the latest evidence pass. This page preserves the structured corpus baseline and states the gap explicitly.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Kalala v. Coopérative d'habitation La Fraternité Micheloise

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); linked document: canlii.org. What AI Vortex adds.

CS Québec · Dec 23, 2025

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Coopérative d’habitation Le Tremplin c. Bouchard, 2009 QCCS 4521 Outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Coopérative d’habitation Le Tremplin c. Bouchard, 2009 QCCS 4521 || Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Syndicat des copropriétaires du 1245 Saint-André c. Deschênes, 2011 QCCA 1234 || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Cited articles from the Code civil du Québec that bear no relation to the case at hand
Why it matters now
Quebec Superior Court now imposes modest cost sanctions on pro-se filers for fabricated QCCS/QCCA citations.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Coopérative d’habitation Le Tremplin c. Bouchard, 2009 QCCS 4521 Outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Operational lesson

Quebec Superior Court now imposes modest cost sanctions on pro-se filers for fabricated QCCS/QCCA citations.

Record details

CourtCS Québec
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateDec 23, 2025
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMonetary Sanction
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Coopérative d’habitation Le Tremplin c. Bouchard, 2009 QCCS 4521
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Syndicat des copropriétaires du 1245 Saint-André c. Deschênes, 2011 QCCA 1234
  3. Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Cited articles from the Code civil du Québec that bear no relation to the case at hand

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kalala v. Coopérative d'habitation La Fraternité Micheloise?
Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Coopérative d’habitation Le Tremplin c. Bouchard, 2009 QCCS 4521 Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Why does Kalala v. Coopérative d'habitation La Fraternité Micheloise matter for legal AI risk?
Quebec Superior Court now imposes modest cost sanctions on pro-se filers for fabricated QCCS/QCCA citations.
What does the public record establish about Kalala v. Coopérative d'habitation La Fraternité Micheloise?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Kalala v. Coopérative d'habitation La Fraternité Micheloise summary?
The recorded source is canlii.org. It is classified as docket or legal-document mirror; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

This record comes from Canada. See Fictitious citations in Canadian courts for counts across the corpus and the court guidance on AI.

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.