HomeCasesState of Israel v. Vakrat

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

State of Israel v. Vakrat

Kiryat Gat Magistrate Court · Apr 23, 2026

IsraelEditorial impact: mediumfake citationscriminaltrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

In State of Israel v. Vakrat, the Kiryat Gat Magistrate Court considered a request to erase a criminal case after the prosecution had withdrawn it. The court found that four cited authorities concerning judicial disqualification were fictitious and appeared to be AI hallucinations; after the applicant did not retract or explain them, it ordered NIS 1,000 in costs.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Fine; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and criminal involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine in Kiryat Gat Magistrate Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and criminal involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine in Kiryat Gat Magistrate Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtKiryat Gat Magistrate Court

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateApr 23, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeNot classified

OutcomeMonetary Fine

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law

Questions this record answers

What happened in State of Israel v. Vakrat?: In State of Israel v. Vakrat, the Kiryat Gat Magistrate Court considered a request to erase a criminal case after the prosecution had withdrawn it. The court found that four cited authorities concerning judicial disqualification were fictitious and appeared to be AI hallucinations; after the applicant did not retract or explain them, it ordered NIS 1,000 in costs.
Why does State of Israel v. Vakrat matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and criminal involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine in Kiryat Gat Magistrate Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about State of Israel v. Vakrat?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this State of Israel v. Vakrat summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

USA v. OrganesN.D. Illinois · Jun 29, 2026fake citations + criminal · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Sent. n. 1027/2026Corte Suprema di Cassazione · Jun 11, 2026fake citations + criminal · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)United States v. Robert Ponce, Jr.D. Nevada · Feb 26, 2026fake citations + criminal · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Processo nº 986/23.7GAFAF.G1TR Guimarães · Feb 10, 2026fake citations + criminal · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)United States v. Michael Shane DeBaere (2)W.D. Virginia · Jan 23, 2026fake citations + criminal · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Fatih Gazioğlu v. KKTC BaşsavcısıYargıtay/Asli Yetki · Jan 22, 2026fake citations + criminal · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Questions this record answers

What happened in State of Israel v. Vakrat?

Why does State of Israel v. Vakrat matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about State of Israel v. Vakrat?

Which source supports this State of Israel v. Vakrat summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.