Stevenson v. Schultz (consolidated with Schultz v. Stevenson)
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CA California (3d) · Nov 4, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Stevenson cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that a foreign divorce decree does not deprive California courts of jurisdiction over property division and support issues. The court stated that the case does not exist. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in CA California (3d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Stevenson cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that a foreign divorce decree does not deprive California courts of jurisdiction over property division and support issues. The court stated that the case does not exist. Outcome: Admonishment.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in CA California (3d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Admonishment
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Stevenson cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that a foreign divorce decree does not deprive California courts of jurisdiction over property division and support issues. The court stated that the case does not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Stevenson cited another nonexistent case for the proposition that a foreign divorce decree does not deprive California courts of jurisdiction over property division and support issues. The court stated that the case does not exist.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Stevenson falsely quoted In re Marriage of Aron as holding that initiating any proceeding in a California court subjects a party to personal jurisdiction in California. The court found no such statement in Aron and explained that Aron only concerns consent to jurisdiction over a related cross-complaint in the action initiated by the nonresident plaintiff.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Stevenson v. Schultz (consolidated with Schultz v. Stevenson)?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Stevenson cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that a foreign divorce decree does not deprive California courts of jurisdiction over property division and support issues. The court stated that the case does not exist. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why does Stevenson v. Schultz (consolidated with Schultz v. Stevenson) matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in CA California (3d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Stevenson v. Schultz (consolidated with Schultz v. Stevenson)?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Stevenson v. Schultz (consolidated with Schultz v. Stevenson) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.