עטיה דויך נ' מתקני פסגות בע"מ
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
Tel Aviv Regional Labor Court · Nov 8, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | The submission attributed a quotation about the proper test for applying an extension order to a case that could not be found under the cited name. The cited proceeding number led to a different case, which did not address extension orders or contain the quotation.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Tel Aviv Regional Labor Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | The submission attributed a quotation about the proper test for applying an extension order to a case that could not be found under the cited name. The cited proceeding number led to a different case, which did not address extension orders or contain the quotation.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Tel Aviv Regional Labor Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The submission attributed a quotation about the proper test for applying an extension order to a case that could not be found under the cited name. The cited proceeding number led to a different case, which did not address extension orders or contain the quotation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The submission attributed a quotation concerning public statements by an employer as evidence of its industry classification to a case that could not be found under the cited name. The cited proceeding number led to a different case that did not concern industry classification or contain the quotation.
- False Quotes: Case Law | The submission attributed a familiar evidentiary quotation concerning failure to produce relevant evidence to ע"א 74/89 חסינים חברה להחזקת נכסים בע"מ נ' נתן שפירא, but the court found that the quotation did not appear in that decision, although it appeared in some of the other authorities cited.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The submission cited a purported case concerning an employer's heightened duty of documentation, reporting, and transparency. Searches produced several decisions under the number, but none had the cited party names or addressed that issue.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The submission cited a purported case concerning a party's affirmative declaration to public authorities. The cited number led to an unrelated equality-rights case, and searches by party names led to a different District Court proceeding.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The submission cited דב"ע נב3-146 חסון as authority, but the court could not identify a decision under that citation matching the authority asserted; searches led to other decisions of the National Labor Court.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The submission attributed a quotation stating that industrial production involving metal components is sufficient to trigger the metal-sector extension orders to a case that could not be found under the cited name. The cited proceeding number led to a different case concerning employee-employer relations, which contained no such quotation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The submission cited a proceeding purportedly concerning the application of extension orders, but no such decision was found. The cited number led to a different case concerning piercing the corporate veil, while a search for the parties led to another case concerning medical committees.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in עטיה דויך נ' מתקני פסגות בע"מ?
- Fabricated: Case Law | The submission attributed a quotation about the proper test for applying an extension order to a case that could not be found under the cited name. The cited proceeding number led to a different case, which did not address extension orders or contain the quotation.
- Why does עטיה דויך נ' מתקני פסגות בע"מ matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Tel Aviv Regional Labor Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about עטיה דויך נ' מתקני פסגות בע"מ?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this עטיה דויך נ' מתקני פסגות בע"מ summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.