AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 17, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesThabize c. Immobilière montérégienne IMR inc.
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Thabize c. Immobilière montérégienne IMR inc.

TAL · Mar 6, 2026

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsadministrativetrialBar Referral
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The tribunal identified that the tenant cited non-existent jurisprudence, which it attributed to artificial intelligence. As a result, the tribunal rejected the tenant's meritless retraction request and imposed a procedural limitation, requiring the tenant to obtain prior authorization before filing any further requests in the case.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Tenant cited a purported decision 'Événtail Habitation inc. c. X, 2023 QCTAL 150'; tribunal (citing opposing party's point) found the jurisprudence unlocatable and likely produced by artificial intelligence.
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAL, with the listed outcome: Further filings barred without prior authorization.

Why this matter is tracked

In a proceeding before the Tribunal administratif du logement (TAL), a pro se tenant sought a retraction of a prior eviction decision, citing a purported legal precedent, 'Événtail Habitation inc. c. X, 2023 QCTAL 150'. The tribunal found the cited jurisprudence to be unlocatable and concluded it was likely generated by artificial intelligence. The tribunal rejected the tenant's retraction request, noting it was meritless and intended to delay the execution of an eviction order. Consequently, the tribunal granted the landlord's request for a procedural limitation, barring the tenant from filing further requests in the matter without prior authorization from the President of the tribunal or their designee.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAL, with the listed outcome: Further filings barred without prior authorization.

Record details

CourtTAL
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateMar 6, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeThe tribunal rejected the tenant's request for retraction and imposed a procedural limitation, prohibiting the tenant from filing further requests in the dossier without prior authorization.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

implied

The tribunal explicitly referenced artificial intelligence as the likely source of the fabricated citation.

Procedural posture

The matter came before the TAL on a tenant's request for retraction of a December 15, 2025, decision, following a hearing on February 19, 2026.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Tenant cited a purported decision 'Événtail Habitation inc. c. X, 2023 QCTAL 150'; tribunal (citing opposing party's point) found the jurisprudence unlocatable and likely produced by artificial intelligence.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Thabize c. Immobilière montérégienne IMR inc.?
The tribunal identified that the tenant cited non-existent jurisprudence, which it attributed to artificial intelligence. As a result, the tribunal rejected the tenant's meritless retraction request and imposed a procedural limitation, requiring the tenant to obtain prior authorization before filing any further requests in the case.
Why does Thabize c. Immobilière montérégienne IMR inc. matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAL, with the listed outcome: Further filings barred without prior authorization.
What does the public record establish about Thabize c. Immobilière montérégienne IMR inc.?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Thabize c. Immobilière montérégienne IMR inc. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Perry v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerN.D. Alabama · Aug 3, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)The JAAW Group, LLCGAO · Jul 31, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Alexander M. v. Frank BisignanoD. Maine · Jul 28, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2143 v. RobibaroOntario Condominium Authority Tribunal · Jul 28, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)14095863 Canada Inc v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jul 3, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Chilly Moose Ltd. v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)