Timothy Lashbrook v Estate of Ila Grasak
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Robert Freund; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CA Michigan · Oct 28, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | The brief falsely attributed to Darin v Haven a quotation stating that “pending” includes appellate litigation until appellate remedies are exhausted; the Court found that language does not appear in the cited case. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Order to Show Cause. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Order to Show Cause in CA Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | The brief falsely attributed to Darin v Haven a quotation stating that “pending” includes appellate litigation until appellate remedies are exhausted; the Court found that language does not appear in the cited case. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Order to Show Cause in CA Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Order to Show Cause
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The brief falsely attributed to Darin v Haven a quotation stating that “pending” includes appellate litigation until appellate remedies are exhausted; the Court found that language does not appear in the cited case.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The brief cited Cobb and Kalakay for a three-part equitable-tolling test, but the Court found the cited cases did not support that proposition.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The brief falsely quoted language as appearing in Darin v Haven, but the quoted statement that the limitations period is suspended while a prior suit involving the same parties and cause of action is pending does not appear in the cited case.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Timothy Lashbrook v Estate of Ila Grasak?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The brief falsely attributed to Darin v Haven a quotation stating that “pending” includes appellate litigation until appellate remedies are exhausted; the Court found that language does not appear in the cited case. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why does Timothy Lashbrook v Estate of Ila Grasak matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Order to Show Cause in CA Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Timothy Lashbrook v Estate of Ila Grasak?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Timothy Lashbrook v Estate of Ila Grasak summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.