Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Craig Goergen
Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2025
IN / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited a non-existent case, 'Hamilton Cnty. Assessor v. Allisonville Rd. P’ship, 170 N.E.3d 1117 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2021)'; the Court found the case does not exist and noted it likely arose from an AI hallucination. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in Indiana Tax Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited a non-existent case, 'Hamilton Cnty. Assessor v. Allisonville Rd. P’ship, 170 N.E.3d 1117 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2021)'; the Court found the case does not exist and noted it likely arose from an AI hallucination. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in Indiana Tax Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
IndianaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtIndiana Tax Court
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit7th Circuit
DateOct 17, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited a non-existent case, 'Hamilton Cnty. Assessor v. Allisonville Rd. P’ship, 170 N.E.3d 1117 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2021)'; the Court found the case does not exist and noted it likely arose from an AI hallucination.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Craig Goergen?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited a non-existent case, 'Hamilton Cnty. Assessor v. Allisonville Rd. P’ship, 170 N.E.3d 1117 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2021)'; the Court found the case does not exist and noted it likely arose from an AI hallucination. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Craig Goergen matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in Indiana Tax Court, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Craig Goergen?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Tippecanoe County Assessor v. Craig Goergen summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.