HomeCasesJana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc.

S.D. Indiana · Mar 19, 2026

IN / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritycivil rights

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Knakmuhs v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. Minn. 2014)'; court was unable to locate that case and found the citation incorrect/non-existent.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in S.D. Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Knakmuhs v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. Minn. 2014)'; court was unable to locate that case and found the citation incorrect/non-existent.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in S.D. Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IndianaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Indiana

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit7th Circuit

DateMar 19, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Knakmuhs v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. Minn. 2014)'; court was unable to locate that case and found the citation incorrect/non-existent.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff's citation corresponded to Cooper v. Tokyo Elec. Power Co., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (S.D. Cal. 2013), not the case plaintiff named.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Powell v. Nat'l Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 364 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2004) as supporting declaratory relief; court noted Powell did not address or grant declaratory relief and was mischaracterized.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Knakmuhs v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. Minn. 2014)'; court was unable to locate that case and found the citation incorrect/non-existent.
Why does Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in S.D. Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

William C. Maxwell v. Dakota Michael & Chelsey SmithS.D. Indiana · May 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Philip D. Dennison v. June Caudill et al.S.D. Indiana · Apr 23, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Michael Platt v. Volunteers of America Ohio & IndianaS.D. Indiana · Mar 10, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Kamia Nellum v. Credit Acceptance CorporationS.D. Indiana · Nov 18, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Tsupko v. Kinetic Advantage, LLCS.D. Indiana · Sep 17, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Elbert Coleman, III; Elbert Coleman, IV v. Nexo Capital Inc.S.D. Indiana · Mar 31, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Knakmuhs v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. Minn. 2014)'; court was unable to locate that case and found the citation incorrect/non-existent.

Operational lesson

Record details

IndianaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Indiana

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit7th Circuit

DateMar 19, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Knakmuhs v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. Minn. 2014)'; court was unable to locate that case and found the citation incorrect/non-existent.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff's citation corresponded to Cooper v. Tokyo Elec. Power Co., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (S.D. Cal. 2013), not the case plaintiff named.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Powell v. Nat'l Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 364 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2004) as supporting declaratory relief; court noted Powell did not address or grant declaratory relief and was mischaracterized.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Knakmuhs v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. Minn. 2014)'; court was unable to locate that case and found the citation incorrect/non-existent.

Why does Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc.?

Which source supports this Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.