HomeCasesTodd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP

W.D. Wisconsin · Nov 4, 2025

WI / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritytort

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the citation; the case 'S.G. v. SafeSport, 74 F.4th 864, 870 (7th Cir. 2023)' does not appear to exist. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the citation; the case 'S.G. v. SafeSport, 74 F.4th 864, 870 (7th Cir. 2023)' does not appear to exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate this district decision; 'Cafasso v. Central Refrigerated Servs., Inc., 486 F. Supp. 2d 1077, 1084 (W.D. Wis. 2007)' does not appear to exist in this district or under that reporter information. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation appears misrepresented: the cited case number 'Cressey v. Hamilton, No. 21-CV-2031 (D. Kan. 2021)' corresponds to a different matter in the District of Kansas.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Wisconsin, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the citation; the case 'S.G. v. SafeSport, 74 F.4th 864, 870 (7th Cir. 2023)' does not appear to exist. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Wisconsin, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

WisconsinSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Wisconsin

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit7th Circuit

DateNov 4, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the citation; the case 'S.G. v. SafeSport, 74 F.4th 864, 870 (7th Cir. 2023)' does not appear to exist.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate this district decision; 'Cafasso v. Central Refrigerated Servs., Inc., 486 F. Supp. 2d 1077, 1084 (W.D. Wis. 2007)' does not appear to exist in this district or under that reporter information.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation appears misrepresented: the cited case number 'Cressey v. Hamilton, No. 21-CV-2031 (D. Kan. 2021)' corresponds to a different matter in the District of Kansas.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the citation; the case 'S.G. v. SafeSport, 74 F.4th 864, 870 (7th Cir. 2023)' does not appear to exist. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Wisconsin, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Branden Driver v. CNA Financial Corporation et al.E.D. Wisconsin · Jun 1, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations SEC v. Joseph Nantomah et al.E.D. Wisconsin · Jan 30, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Gerou v. George, Whitten, and United StatesE.D. Wisconsin · Dec 18, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Alaya Coleman v. RPF-Somers Investors, LLC, et al.E.D. Wisconsin · Nov 4, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Giggs v. Michel (dba Soma MD Advanced Medical Aesthetics)CRT · Jul 16, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Blackburn v. United StatesW.D. Oklahoma · Apr 7, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Record details

WisconsinSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Wisconsin

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit7th Circuit

DateNov 4, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the citation; the case 'S.G. v. SafeSport, 74 F.4th 864, 870 (7th Cir. 2023)' does not appear to exist.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate this district decision; 'Cafasso v. Central Refrigerated Servs., Inc., 486 F. Supp. 2d 1077, 1084 (W.D. Wis. 2007)' does not appear to exist in this district or under that reporter information.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation appears misrepresented: the cited case number 'Cressey v. Hamilton, No. 21-CV-2031 (D. Kan. 2021)' corresponds to a different matter in the District of Kansas.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the citation; the case 'S.G. v. SafeSport, 74 F.4th 864, 870 (7th Cir. 2023)' does not appear to exist. Outcome: Warning.

Why does Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Wisconsin, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP?

Which source supports this Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLP summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.