Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Villasenor v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
California SC · Oct 28, 2025
CA / stateEditorial impact: lowfake citationsemploymenttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition cited 'Bilo v. Dept. of Defense (D. Haw. 2010) 720 F. Supp. 2d 1267'; the Court determined this case does not exist and refused to treat it as supporting authority.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition cited 'Bilo v. Dept. of Defense (D. Haw. 2010) 720 F. Supp. 2d 1267'; the Court determined this case does not exist and refused to treat it as supporting authority.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in California SC, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition cited 'Bilo v. Dept. of Defense (D. Haw. 2010) 720 F. Supp. 2d 1267'; the Court determined this case does not exist and refused to treat it as supporting authority.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in California SC, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Record details
CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCalifornia SC
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateOct 28, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition cited 'Bilo v. Dept. of Defense (D. Haw. 2010) 720 F. Supp. 2d 1267'; the Court determined this case does not exist and refused to treat it as supporting authority.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Villasenor v. Ralphs Grocery Co.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition cited 'Bilo v. Dept. of Defense (D. Haw. 2010) 720 F. Supp. 2d 1267'; the Court determined this case does not exist and refused to treat it as supporting authority.
- Why does Villasenor v. Ralphs Grocery Co. matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in California SC, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
- What does the public record establish about Villasenor v. Ralphs Grocery Co.?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Villasenor v. Ralphs Grocery Co. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.