HomeCasesChrist Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.

CA Iowa · May 27, 2026

IA / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritytort

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's briefs included citations to cases that do not exist, i.e., fabricated case citations mentioned without supporting authority. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's briefs included citations to cases that do not exist, i.e., fabricated case citations mentioned without supporting authority. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IowaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Iowa

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit8th Circuit

DateMay 27, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's briefs included citations to cases that do not exist, i.e., fabricated case citations mentioned without supporting authority.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited existing cases but attributed holdings or propositions to them that they do not support (misstated holdings / misrepresented precedent).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's briefs included citations to cases that do not exist, i.e., fabricated case citations mentioned without supporting authority. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Nisland Asset Investment, LLC v. Carissa Ann GerickeCA Iowa · Apr 29, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations In the Interest of W.G., Minor ChildCA Iowa · Apr 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations State of Iowa ex rel J.G. v. Mynesia A. AndersonCA Iowa · Jun 10, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Turner v. GarrelsCA Iowa · Sep 4, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Luke v. Iowa DHHSCA Iowa · Aug 6, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Matthew Merz v. Harlyn Jenkins, Jillane Baros, Melinda Finn‑KamerathCA Washington · Jun 15, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's briefs included citations to cases that do not exist, i.e., fabricated case citations mentioned without supporting authority. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's briefs included citations to cases that do not exist, i.e., fabricated case citations mentioned without supporting authority.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited existing cases but attributed holdings or propositions to them that they do not support (misstated holdings / misrepresented precedent).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's briefs included citations to cases that do not exist, i.e., fabricated case citations mentioned without supporting authority. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why does Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.?

Which source supports this Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.