Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell Sadler
CA Texas · Jun 12, 2026
TX / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritytort
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's initial brief contained at least four fabricated case citations and numerous citations that did not support the propositions asserted; the court struck the brief and ordered an amended brief. Outcome: Order to amend brief.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to amend brief; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to amend brief in CA Texas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's initial brief contained at least four fabricated case citations and numerous citations that did not support the propositions asserted; the court struck the brief and ordered an amended brief. Outcome: Order to amend brief.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to amend brief in CA Texas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
TexasSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Texas
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit5th Circuit
DateJun 12, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeOrder to amend brief
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to amend brief
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's initial brief contained at least four fabricated case citations and numerous citations that did not support the propositions asserted; the court struck the brief and ordered an amended brief.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's reply brief contained at least two hallucinated (fabricated) citations and multiple mischaracterizations of cited cases.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellees' brief identified at least one hallucinated citation in appellant's filings and noted multiple instances where holdings were misrepresented.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell Sadler?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's initial brief contained at least four fabricated case citations and numerous citations that did not support the propositions asserted; the court struck the brief and ordered an amended brief. Outcome: Order to amend brief.
- Why does Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell Sadler matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to amend brief in CA Texas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell Sadler?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell Sadler summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.