Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Practice: other

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

An v. Archblock, Inc.pro se · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityPractice area: otherDelaware Ch.DE · stateApr 4, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low McKeown v. Paycom Payroll LLCpro se · fake citations · employmentPractice area: otherW.D. OklahomaOK · federalMar 31, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Sanders v. USApro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityPractice area: otherFed. claims courtUnited States · federalMar 31, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—low Kruglyak v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityPractice area: otherW.D. VirginiaVA · federalMar 25, 2025ChatGPT—medium Williams v. Capital One Bankpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityPractice area: otherD. DCDC · federalMar 18, 2025CoCounsel—career ending Bunce v. Visual Technology Innovations (1)fake citations · misrepresented authority · otherPractice area: otherE.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalFeb 27, 2025ChatGPT$2.5Kmedium Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityPractice area: otherCivil Resolution TribunalCanada · internationalFeb 14, 2025Copilot—low Gonzalez v. Texas Taxpayers and Research Associationfake citations · misrepresented authority · otherPractice area: otherW.D. TexasTX · federalJan 29, 2025Lexis Nexis's AI$4.0Kmedium Postma v. Yorkpro se · fake citations · contractPractice area: otherD. IowaIA · federalJan 2, 2025Unidentified—medium Al-Hamim v. Star Hearthstonepro se · fake citations · contractPractice area: otherColoradoCO · stateDec 26, 2024Unidentified—low Hamdan v. the National Insurance Institutefake citations · misrepresented authority · bankruptcyPractice area: otherMagistrate CourtIsrael · internationalDec 10, 2024Unidentified—medium John Coulsto et al. v Elliottpro se · contract · trialPractice area: otherThe High CourtIreland · internationalDec 10, 2024AI (implied, unspecified)—low Carlos E. Gutierrez v. In Re Noemi D. Gutierrezpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesPractice area: otherCA Florida (3d)FL · stateDec 4, 2024Unidentified—low Rasmussen v. Rasmussenfake citations · misrepresented authority · contractPractice area: otherCaliforniaCA · stateAug 23, 2024AI (implied, unspecified)—low Robert Lafayette v. Blueprint Basketball et alpro se · fake citations · otherPractice area: otherVermont SCVT · stateApr 26, 2024Unidentified—medium Novitzky v. Transunion LLCpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesPractice area: otherC.D. CaliforniaCA · federalApr 11, 2024AI (implied, unspecified)—low Matter of Samuelfake citations · misrepresented authority · otherPractice area: otherCC New YorkNY · stateJan 11, 2024Unidentified—low Scott v. Federal National Mortgage Associationpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesPractice area: otherMaine Superior CourtME · stateJun 14, 2023Unidentified—low

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow