HomeCasesGeismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 91/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970

Civil Resolution Tribunal · Feb 14, 2025

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityother

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination. Outcome: Citations ignored.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Citations ignored; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Microsoft Copilot hallucinates case citations as reliably as ChatGPT — no consumer AI tool is safe for legal research.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Microsoft Copilot hallucinates case citations as reliably as ChatGPT — no consumer AI tool is safe for legal research.

Record details

CourtCivil Resolution Tribunal

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateFeb 14, 2025

AI toolCopilot

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeCitations ignored

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Copilot is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Citations ignored

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

10 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.

Show 2 additional discrepancies

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Applicants misrepresented Jordison (2013) as supporting that strata cannot force removal of unauthorized alterations; tribunal noted the three 2013 Jordison decisions exist but none concern unauthorized alterations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970?: Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination. Outcome: Citations ignored.
Why does Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970 matter for legal AI risk?: Microsoft Copilot hallucinates case citations as reliably as ChatGPT — no consumer AI tool is safe for legal research.
What does the public record establish about Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Maxwell v. WestJet Airlines Ltd.Civil Resolution Tribunal · Aug 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Chen v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS3094Civil Resolution Tribunal · May 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Blaser v. CampbellCivil Resolution Tribunal · Jul 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Mullins v. Duquesne University of the Holy SpiritW.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2026pro se + fake citations Birsingh v. Little Wheel, LLC, et al.M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2026pro se + fake citations Kevin Krzeminski v. Janine McQuillanSC New York · Jul 6, 2026pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Microsoft Copilot hallucinates case citations as reliably as ChatGPT — no consumer AI tool is safe for legal research.

Tracked discrepancy record

10 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.

Show 2 additional discrepancies

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a nonexistent case (one of nine AI-sourced items without legal citations); tribunal found it does not exist and is likely a Copilot hallucination.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Applicants misrepresented Jordison (2013) as supporting that strata cannot force removal of unauthorized alterations; tribunal noted the three 2013 Jordison decisions exist but none concern unauthorized alterations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970?

Why does Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970 matter for legal AI risk?

Microsoft Copilot hallucinates case citations as reliably as ChatGPT — no consumer AI tool is safe for legal research.

What does the public record establish about Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970?

Which source supports this Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.