Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-09RXB8EGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

N.D. California

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records27
Source linked100%
Known amount total$18,002
Recorded rangeMay 19, 2025 Aug 20, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in N.D. California?

AI Vortex currently links 27 source-linked public matters associated with N.D. California. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (23), Misrepresented authority (8) and Fabricated or altered quotations (5). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (10), Monetary sanction (7) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (7). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 27
Aug 20, 2026Full Standard Properties, LLC v. SJ 6070, LLCN.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 22, 2026Adrienne Hankins v. Dentons US LLP, et al.N.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 22, 2026Zhdanovich-Doty v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyN.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 13, 2026Joseph Guy v. AFGEN.D. CaliforniaClaudeSource
May 6, 2026Gregoire v. Board of Trustees of SF BARTN.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 28, 2026Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)N.D. CaliforniaCoCounselSource
Apr 28, 2026Louis L. Ligon III v. Meta Platforms, Inc.N.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 7, 2026Thanh Nguy v. Jabil Inc.N.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 3, 2026Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.N.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 1, 2026Saqib Kafeel v. Apple Inc., et al.N.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Feb 17, 2026In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction LitigationN.D. CaliforniaUnidentifiedSource
Feb 4, 2026Sebastian Rako v. VMware LLC (2)N.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.