HomeCasesAnthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)

N.D. California · Apr 28, 2026

CA / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authorityemploymenttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Filed brief included a citation to a nonexistent case; court found the citation fabricated and tied its inclusion in part to AI use. Outcome: Admonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving CoCounsel with Admonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation in N.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving CoCounsel with Admonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation in N.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 28, 2026

AI toolCoCounsel

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation

Known amount$1,001

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

CoCounsel is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Filed brief included a citation to a nonexistent case; court found the citation fabricated and tied its inclusion in part to AI use.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found the brief misrepresented the holding of a real case cited by counsel.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)?: Fabricated: Case Law | Filed brief included a citation to a nonexistent case; court found the citation fabricated and tied its inclusion in part to AI use. Outcome: Admonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation.
Why does Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2) matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving CoCounsel with Admonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation in N.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2) summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (1)N.D. California · Sep 5, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Adrienne Hankins v. Dentons US LLP, et al.N.D. California · Jun 22, 2026same court · fake citations + employment Thanh Nguy v. Jabil Inc.N.D. California · Apr 7, 2026same court · fake citations + employment In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction LitigationN.D. California · Feb 17, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Hang Zhang v. Daniel DriscollN.D. California · Jan 14, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Marc Henri David v. George Chiala Farms, Inc.N.D. California · Nov 7, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 28, 2026

AI toolCoCounsel

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment; Monetary Fine; 4 hours live CLE; Order Circulation

Known amount$1,001

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Filed brief included a citation to a nonexistent case; court found the citation fabricated and tied its inclusion in part to AI use.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found the brief misrepresented the holding of a real case cited by counsel.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)?

Why does Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2) matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)?

Which source supports this Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2) summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.