Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-0VWMXO3Generated October 16, 2026Evidence checked Oct 12, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

S.D. New York

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records55
Source linked100%
Known amount total$104,768
Recorded rangeJun 22, 2023 – Oct 5, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in S.D. New York?

AI Vortex currently links 55 source-linked public matters associated with S.D. New York. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (44), Fabricated or altered quotations (27) and Misrepresented authority (19). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (26), No adjudicated consequence recorded (18) and Monetary sanction (6). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 55
Oct 5, 2026Cooper v. John Doe County Court Clerk et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 30, 2026Sexton v. Department of Homeless Services, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 29, 2026Tijerino v. Spotify USA Inc.S.D. New YorkLexSource
Sep 22, 2026Lawand Hill v. Foundation Media LLCS.D. New YorkHarveySource
Sep 14, 2026Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al.S.D. New YorkChatGPTSource
Sep 8, 2026Philippeaux v. United States, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 27, 2026Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLCS.D. New YorkUnidentifiedSource
Jul 31, 2026Fernando Justino Santana v. Shook Hardy & Bacon, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 12, 2026Jason Wimberly v. Verizon New York Inc.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.