Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-0VWMXO3Generated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 12, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

S.D. New York

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records50
Source linked100%
Known amount total$104,268
Recorded rangeJun 22, 2023 Sep 8, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in S.D. New York?

AI Vortex currently links 50 source-linked public matters associated with S.D. New York. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (41), Fabricated or altered quotations (26) and Misrepresented authority (16). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (24), No adjudicated consequence recorded (17) and Bar or professional referral (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 50
Sep 8, 2026Philippeaux v. United States, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 27, 2026Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLCS.D. New YorkUnidentifiedSource
Jul 31, 2026Fernando Justino Santana v. Shook Hardy & Bacon, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 12, 2026Jason Wimberly v. Verizon New York Inc.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 9, 2026LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. RedstoneS.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 26, 2026Hodges v. McGough Enterprises LLCS.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 22, 2026Sana Hazina Butler v. Fidelity Management & Research Company LLCS.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 19, 2026Chakma v. Sushi Katsuei, Inc.S.D. New YorkLexisNexis AISource
May 16, 2026Waggeh v. Utility Workers Union of America Local 1-2 et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.